PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRAB vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GRAB vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a -30.06% return, which is significantly lower than UBER's -12.58% return.


GRAB

1D
-2.24%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
-30.06%
6M
-32.63%
1Y
-22.27%
3Y*
2.93%
5Y*
-21.50%
10Y*

UBER

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.54%
YTD
-12.58%
6M
-12.10%
1Y
-14.74%
3Y*
18.12%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRAB vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
GRAB
Grab Holdings Limited
-30.06%5.72%40.06%4.66%-54.84%-44.56%8.16%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-12.58%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between GRAB and UBER is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2020

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRAB:

$15.50B

UBER:

$147.96B

EPS

GRAB:

$0.09

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

GRAB:

39.82

UBER:

17.62

PS Ratio

GRAB:

4.25

UBER:

2.80

PB Ratio

GRAB:

2.38

UBER:

5.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRAB:

$3.55B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRAB:

$1.55B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRAB:

$481.00M

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRAB vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRAB
GRAB Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GRAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRAB Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GRAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRAB Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRAB vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRABUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.95

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

-0.47

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.79

-0.80

+0.01

GRAB vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRAB and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRAB vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRABUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.46%

-68.05%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.30%

-31.46%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.30%

-31.46%

-17.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.46%

-60.45%

-26.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.54%

-28.64%

-50.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.38%

-25.68%

-41.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.07%

18.36%

+9.71%

Volatility

GRAB vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 10.44%. This indicates that GRAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRABUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.12%

10.44%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.26%

23.69%

+1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.92%

33.28%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.94%

44.89%

+15.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.39%

50.60%

+9.79%

Dividends

GRAB vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAB nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GRAB vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grab Holdings Limited and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
955.00M
13.20B
(GRAB) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRAB vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grab Holdings Limited and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
43.4%
45.0%
Portfolio components
GRAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 414.00M and revenue of 955.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

GRAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 75.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

GRAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GRAB and UBER have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRAB has higher volatility (11.12%) compared to UBER (10.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRAB dropped -86.46% vs UBER's -68.05%.

UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRAB and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer