PortfoliosLab logo
GRAB vs. LYFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GRAB and LYFT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GRAB vs. LYFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-75.00%-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-59.29%
-67.46%
GRAB
LYFT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GRAB:

0.78

LYFT:

-0.40

Sortino Ratio

GRAB:

1.34

LYFT:

-0.25

Omega Ratio

GRAB:

1.21

LYFT:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

GRAB:

0.47

LYFT:

-0.27

Martin Ratio

GRAB:

2.87

LYFT:

-0.84

Ulcer Index

GRAB:

13.35%

LYFT:

28.08%

Daily Std Dev

GRAB:

49.39%

LYFT:

58.85%

Max Drawdown

GRAB:

-86.46%

LYFT:

-89.79%

Current Drawdown

GRAB:

-71.63%

LYFT:

-83.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GRAB:

$19.92B

LYFT:

$5.55B

EPS

GRAB:

$0.01

LYFT:

$0.06

PE Ratio

GRAB:

489.00

LYFT:

220.00

PS Ratio

GRAB:

6.79

LYFT:

0.96

PB Ratio

GRAB:

3.07

LYFT:

6.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

GRAB:

$2.92B

LYFT:

$4.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GRAB:

$1.24B

LYFT:

$2.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

GRAB:

$185.00M

LYFT:

-$129.43M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly higher than LYFT's -0.08% return.


GRAB

YTD

2.54%

1M

29.76%

6M

15.51%

1Y

37.11%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LYFT

YTD

-0.08%

1M

18.91%

6M

-6.59%

1Y

-26.43%

5Y*

-16.57%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRAB vs. LYFT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GRAB is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GRAB is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

LYFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LYFT is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LYFT is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LYFT is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LYFT is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LYFT is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LYFT is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GRAB vs. LYFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GRAB Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the LYFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRAB and LYFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.78
-0.40
GRAB
LYFT

Dividends

GRAB vs. LYFT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAB nor LYFT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GRAB vs. LYFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, roughly equal to the maximum LYFT drawdown of -89.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and LYFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%-70.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-71.63%
-80.88%
GRAB
LYFT

Volatility

GRAB vs. LYFT - Volatility Comparison

Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) has a higher volatility of 20.41% compared to Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) at 17.58%. This indicates that GRAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
20.41%
17.58%
GRAB
LYFT

Financials

GRAB vs. LYFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grab Holdings Limited and Lyft, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20212022202320242025
773.00M
1.55B
(GRAB) Total Revenue
(LYFT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GRAB vs. LYFT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Grab Holdings Limited and Lyft, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
41.9%
57.7%
(GRAB) Gross Margin
(LYFT) Gross Margin
GRAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 324.00M and revenue of 773.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.

LYFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 894.47M and revenue of 1.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.7%.

GRAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 8.00M and revenue of 773.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

LYFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.95M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

GRAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 24.00M and revenue of 773.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.

LYFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 61.73M and revenue of 1.55B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.