GRAB vs. LYFT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT).

Performance

GRAB vs. LYFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GRAB vs. LYFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited	-26.45%	5.72%	40.06%	4.66%	-54.84%	-44.56%	8.16%
LYFT Lyft, Inc.	-31.39%	50.16%	-13.94%	36.03%	-74.21%	-13.03%	24.03%

Fundamentals

EPS GRAB : $0.06 LYFT : $0.33
PE Ratio GRAB : 58.90 LYFT : 40.36
PS Ratio GRAB : 4.66 LYFT : 0.78
Total Revenue (TTM) GRAB : $3.37B LYFT : $4.72B
Gross Profit (TTM) GRAB : $1.46B LYFT : $2.00B
EBITDA (TTM) GRAB : $421.00M LYFT : $208.24M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a -26.45% return, which is significantly higher than LYFT's -31.39% return.

GRAB

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: -12.20%
• YTD: -26.45%
• 6M: -37.80%
• 1Y: -19.34%
• 3Y*: 6.83%
• 5Y*: -21.03%
• 10Y*: —

LYFT

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: -31.39%
• 6M: -39.09%
• 1Y: 8.67%
• 3Y*: 12.76%
• 5Y*: -27.12%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GRAB vs. LYFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRAB

GRAB Risk / Return Rank: 23
GRAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
GRAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
GRAB Omega Ratio Rank: 22
GRAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
GRAB Martin Ratio Rank: 24

LYFT

LYFT Risk / Return Rank: 46
LYFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
LYFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
LYFT Omega Ratio Rank: 45
LYFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
LYFT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRAB vs. LYFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GRAB	LYFT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	0.14	-0.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.36	0.70	-1.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.09	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.42	0.25	-0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.96	0.55	-1.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GRAB vs. LYFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRAB Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the LYFT Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRAB and LYFT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GRAB	LYFT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43	0.14	-0.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	-0.40	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.32	-0.33	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between GRAB and LYFT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GRAB vs. LYFT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GRAB nor LYFT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GRAB vs. LYFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, roughly equal to the maximum LYFT drawdown of -89.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and LYFT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRAB	LYFT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.46%	-89.79%	+3.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-45.27%	-48.51%	+3.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.46%	-87.64%	+1.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-78.49%	-83.02%	+4.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.97%	-64.26%	-2.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.84%	21.74%	-1.90%

Volatility

GRAB vs. LYFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is 10.25%, while Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that GRAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRAB	LYFT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.25%	13.10%	-2.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.40%	37.87%	-10.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.26%	60.47%	-15.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.60%	67.72%	-7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.29%	68.80%	-7.51%

Financials