GRAB vs. LYFT
GRAB (Grab Holdings Limited) and LYFT (Lyft, Inc.) are both stocks. GRAB operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while LYFT operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, GRAB returned -21.42%/yr vs -24.49%/yr for LYFT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRAB vs. LYFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRAB achieves a -31.66% return, which is significantly lower than LYFT's -27.26% return.
GRAB
- 1D
- -5.28%
- 1M
- -5.80%
- YTD
- -31.66%
- 6M
- -35.29%
- 1Y
- -31.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- -21.42%
- 10Y*
- —
LYFT
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- -27.26%
- 6M
- -36.90%
- 1Y
- -8.21%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- -24.49%
- 10Y*
- —
GRAB vs. LYFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRAB Grab Holdings Limited | -31.66% | 5.72% | 40.06% | 4.66% | -54.84% | -44.56% | 8.16% |
LYFT Lyft, Inc. | -27.26% | 50.16% | -13.94% | 36.03% | -74.21% | -13.03% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRAB and LYFT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2020 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
GRAB:
$15.15B
LYFT:
$5.67B
GRAB:
$0.09
LYFT:
$6.90
GRAB:
38.90
LYFT:
2.04
GRAB:
4.15
LYFT:
0.90
GRAB:
2.32
LYFT:
1.87
GRAB:
$3.55B
LYFT:
$6.52B
GRAB:
$1.55B
LYFT:
$2.82B
GRAB:
$481.00M
LYFT:
$51.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRAB vs. LYFT — Risk / Return Rank
GRAB
LYFT
GRAB vs. LYFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) and Lyft, Inc. (LYFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GRAB | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | -0.17 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | 0.11 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.01 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.17 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -0.30 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GRAB | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | -0.17 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.36 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | -0.31 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
GRAB vs. LYFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRAB drawdown since its inception was -86.46%, roughly equal to the maximum LYFT drawdown of -89.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRAB and LYFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRAB | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.46% | -89.79% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.13% | -48.51% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.13% | -55.23% | +8.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.46% | -87.28% | +0.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.01% | -82.00% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.32% | -64.69% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.21% | 27.44% | -1.23% |
Volatility
GRAB vs. LYFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Grab Holdings Limited (GRAB) is 8.63%, while Lyft, Inc. (LYFT) has a volatility of 11.57%. This indicates that GRAB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRAB | LYFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.63% | 11.57% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.14% | 34.76% | -10.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.34% | 49.93% | -11.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.87% | 67.45% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.58% | 68.23% | -7.65% |
Dividends
GRAB vs. LYFT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GRAB nor LYFT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GRAB vs. LYFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Grab Holdings Limited and Lyft, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GRAB vs. LYFT - Profitability Comparison
GRAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 414.00M and revenue of 955.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.4%.
LYFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a gross profit of 786.35M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.6%.
GRAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 75.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
LYFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.33M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
GRAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Grab Holdings Limited reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 955.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.
LYFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lyft, Inc. reported a net income of 14.25M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GRAB and LYFT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LYFT has higher volatility (11.57%) compared to GRAB (8.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRAB dropped -86.46% vs LYFT's -89.79%.
LYFT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRAB and LYFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer