LFMD vs. IESC
LFMD (LifeMD, Inc.) and IESC (IES Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. LFMD operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while IESC operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LFMD returned 10.41%/yr vs 48.90%/yr for IESC. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LFMD vs. IESC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFMD achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 91.39% return. Over the past 10 years, LFMD has underperformed IESC with an annualized return of 10.41%, while IESC has yielded a comparatively higher 48.90% annualized return.
LFMD
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -28.13%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 1Y
- -64.79%
- 3Y*
- -7.69%
- 5Y*
- -18.63%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.84%
IESC
- 1D
- 30.27%
- 1M
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 95.78%
- YTD
- 91.39%
- 1Y
- 112.48%
- 3Y*
- 134.42%
- 5Y*
- 68.75%
- 10Y*
- 48.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $133.30M | $144.24M | $175.40M | |
LFMD LifeMD, Inc. | $3.21M | $3.24M | $4.21M |
LFMD vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFMD LifeMD, Inc. | 2.64% | -31.11% | -40.29% | 327.32% | -49.87% | -40.74% | 988.33% | -14.29% | -58.82% | 29.77% |
IESC IES Holdings, Inc. | 91.39% | 93.58% | 153.67% | 122.72% | -29.76% | 9.99% | 79.42% | 65.02% | -9.86% | -9.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFMD and IESC is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.06 |
The correlation between LFMD and IESC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFMD:
$169.27M
IESC:
$14.83B
LFMD:
-$0.36
IESC:
$27.72
LFMD:
0.75
IESC:
3.77
LFMD:
11.02
IESC:
12.23
LFMD:
$219.42M
IESC:
$3.99B
LFMD:
$190.14M
IESC:
$1.03B
LFMD:
-$6.29M
IESC:
$582.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFMD vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank
LFMD
IESC
LFMD vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFMD | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.28 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 3.16 | -4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 11.65 | -12.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFMD vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFMD drawdown since its inception was -96.24%, roughly equal to the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFMD and IESC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFMD | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.24% | -98.78% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.62% | -35.26% | -43.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.47% | -49.23% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.52% | -54.22% | -34.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.24% | -54.28% | -41.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.54% | -2.87% | -85.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.69% | -54.78% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 63.12% | 9.56% | +53.56% |
Volatility
LFMD vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) is 17.58%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 37.94%. This indicates that LFMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFMD | IESC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.58% | 37.94% | -20.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.73% | 61.10% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.56% | 73.89% | +18.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.40% | 57.05% | +30.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 115.60% | 49.51% | +66.09% |
Dividends
LFMD vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison
Neither LFMD nor IESC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LFMD vs. IESC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeMD, Inc. and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFMD vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison
LFMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeMD, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.24M and revenue of 50.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.2%.
IESC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 340.66M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
LFMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeMD, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.93M and revenue of 50.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.8%.
IESC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 178.55M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
LFMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LifeMD, Inc. reported a net income of -9.65M and revenue of 50.16M, resulting in a net margin of -19.2%.
IESC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 256.13M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 20.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFMD and IESC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IESC has higher volatility (37.94%) compared to LFMD (17.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFMD dropped -96.24% vs IESC's -98.78%.
IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFMD and IESC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer