LFMD vs. FIX
LFMD (LifeMD, Inc.) and FIX (Comfort Systems USA, Inc.) are both stocks. LFMD operates in Pharmaceutical Retailers (Healthcare), while FIX operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LFMD returned 12.87%/yr vs 50.88%/yr for FIX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFMD vs. FIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFMD achieves a 33.72% return, which is significantly lower than FIX's 98.41% return. Over the past 10 years, LFMD has underperformed FIX with an annualized return of 12.87%, while FIX has yielded a comparatively higher 50.88% annualized return.
LFMD
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -10.41%
- YTD
- 33.72%
- 6M
- 22.58%
- 1Y
- -63.95%
- 3Y*
- 28.68%
- 5Y*
- -19.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
FIX
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -2.18%
- YTD
- 98.41%
- 6M
- 95.06%
- 1Y
- 273.24%
- 3Y*
- 129.39%
- 5Y*
- 85.41%
- 10Y*
- 50.88%
LFMD vs. FIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFMD LifeMD, Inc. | 33.72% | -31.11% | -40.29% | 327.32% | -49.87% | -40.74% | 988.33% | -14.29% | -58.82% | 29.77% |
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 98.41% | 120.86% | 106.89% | 79.62% | 16.98% | 88.98% | 6.73% | 15.07% | 0.73% | 32.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFMD and FIX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, LFMD and FIX have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LFMD:
$215.85M
FIX:
$65.22B
LFMD:
-$0.37
FIX:
$34.64
LFMD:
0.96
FIX:
6.45
LFMD:
14.36
FIX:
23.17
LFMD:
$219.42M
FIX:
$10.14B
LFMD:
$190.14M
FIX:
$2.55B
LFMD:
-$6.29M
FIX:
$1.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFMD vs. FIX — Risk / Return Rank
LFMD
FIX
LFMD vs. FIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) and Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFMD | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.67 | -0.79 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 19.99 | -20.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 62.95 | -63.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFMD | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | 5.18 | -5.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 1.93 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 1.21 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.40 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
LFMD vs. FIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFMD drawdown since its inception was -96.24%, roughly equal to the maximum FIX drawdown of -93.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFMD and FIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFMD | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.24% | -93.36% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.47% | -13.77% | -68.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -82.47% | -46.05% | -36.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.74% | -46.05% | -46.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.24% | -49.68% | -46.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.07% | -9.38% | -75.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -38.09% | -20.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 64.06% | 4.36% | +59.70% |
Volatility
LFMD vs. FIX - Volatility Comparison
LifeMD, Inc. (LFMD) has a higher volatility of 25.87% compared to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (FIX) at 12.90%. This indicates that LFMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFMD | FIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.87% | 12.90% | +12.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.23% | 37.41% | +25.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.76% | 53.25% | +38.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.00% | 44.43% | +43.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 116.07% | 42.33% | +73.74% |
Dividends
LFMD vs. FIX - Dividend Comparison
LFMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIX Comfort Systems USA, Inc. | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.28% | 0.41% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.81% | 0.79% | 0.76% | 0.68% | 0.83% | 0.88% |
LFMD LifeMD, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LFMD vs. FIX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeMD, Inc. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFMD vs. FIX - Profitability Comparison
LFMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeMD, Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.24M and revenue of 50.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.2%.
FIX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 754.41M and revenue of 2.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.3%.
LFMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeMD, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.93M and revenue of 50.16M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.8%.
FIX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.72M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.0%.
LFMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeMD, Inc. reported a net income of -9.65M and revenue of 50.16M, resulting in a net margin of -19.2%.
FIX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Comfort Systems USA, Inc. reported a net income of 370.38M and revenue of 2.87B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFMD and FIX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFMD has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to FIX (12.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFMD dropped -96.24% vs FIX's -93.36%.
FIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.18 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFMD and FIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer