LFEQ vs. SGRT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. LFEQ is passively managed, while SGRT is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for SGRT.

Performance

LFEQ vs. SGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than SGRT's 25.07% return.

LFEQ

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 0.35%
• 6M: 8.40%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: 15.35%
• 5Y*: 8.90%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.53%

SGRT

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -7.04%
• 6M: 20.49%
• YTD: 25.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	$53.35K	$94.32K	$91.22K
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	$998.46K	$1.36M	$2.23M

LFEQ vs. SGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	9.84%	7.18%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	25.07%	26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and SGRT is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. SGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFEQ

LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 64
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SGRT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFEQ vs. SGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFEQ	SGRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.09	—	—

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. SGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, which is greater than SGRT's maximum drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and SGRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFEQ	SGRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-24.98%	-10.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-18.61%	+17.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-4.25%	-1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LFEQ	SGRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	38.93%	-26.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.47%	38.93%	-24.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.53%	38.93%	-21.40%

LFEQ vs. SGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SGRT's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFEQ vs. SGRT - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than SGRT's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	0.82%	0.90%	0.74%	1.56%	1.19%	0.37%	2.06%	1.45%	1.07%	0.79%
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF	0.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFEQ and SGRT in my portfolio?

LFEQ and SGRT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LFEQ or SGRT?

On fees, LFEQ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFEQ or SGRT?

LFEQ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFEQ or SGRT?

LFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.13% for SGRT.

What is the main difference between LFEQ and SGRT?

Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.59% for SGRT.