LFEQ vs. LOWV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and LOWV (AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while LOWV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. LFEQ is passively managed, while LOWV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LFEQ returned 18.29%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for LOWV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for LOWV.

Performance

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than LOWV's 2.73% return.

LFEQ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

LOWV

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 6M: 2.69%
• 1Y: 10.86%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	10.63%	10.49%	24.30%	12.88%
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	2.73%	12.26%	20.43%	20.41%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and LOWV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.87

The correlation between LFEQ and LOWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LFEQ	LOWV
Technology	33.6%	32.6%
Financial Services	12.2%	14.9%
Communication Services	10.5%	9.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.4%
Healthcare	9.5%	11.4%
Industrials	8.5%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	5.5%
Energy	4.0%	2.4%
Utilities	2.6%	4.8%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	-

Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. LOWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFEQ

LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LOWV

LOWV Risk / Return Rank: 28
LOWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LOWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LOWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
LOWV Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFEQ	LOWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.04	+1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	1.50	+1.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.18	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	1.14	+1.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.08	4.65	+9.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the LOWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEQ and LOWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFEQ	LOWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.04	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	1.47	-0.79

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, which is greater than LOWV's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and LOWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFEQ	LOWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-13.87%	-21.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-9.59%	+0.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	-13.87%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.95%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-1.50%	-4.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.34%	-0.39%

Volatility

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) at 2.17%. This indicates that LFEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFEQ	LOWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	2.17%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	7.89%	+1.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	10.47%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	11.95%	+2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	11.95%	+5.63%

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LOWV's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFEQ vs. LOWV - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than LOWV's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	0.82%	0.90%	0.74%	1.56%	1.19%	0.37%	2.06%	1.45%	1.07%	0.79%
LOWV AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF	0.91%	0.85%	0.92%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFEQ and LOWV in my portfolio?

LFEQ and LOWV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFEQ or LOWV?

LFEQ has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to LOWV (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs LOWV's -13.87%.

Which ETF is better, LFEQ or LOWV?

On 3-year performance, LFEQ leads with 18.29% vs 15.49% for LOWV. On fees, LOWV is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, LOWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFEQ or LOWV?

Over the 3-year period, LFEQ has performed better with a 18.29% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFEQ or LOWV?

LOWV is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFEQ or LOWV?

LOWV has the higher dividend yield at 0.91%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.

What is the main difference between LFEQ and LOWV?

LFEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while LOWV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.48% for LOWV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.