LFEQ vs. GQGU
LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. LFEQ is passively managed, while GQGU is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 6.60% return.
LFEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 10.63% | 9.66% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 6.60% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and GQGU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
GQGU
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFEQ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFEQ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.60 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -6.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -6.65% | -28.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -4.66% | +4.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -2.54% | -3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | — | — |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 10.14% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 10.14% | +4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 10.14% | +7.44% |
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than GQGU's 0.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.96% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFEQ and GQGU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for LFEQ and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer