LFEQ vs. DLN
LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and DLN (WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - LFEQ tracks the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD while DLN tracks the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 9.91%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for DLN. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DLN.
Performance
LFEQ vs. DLN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly higher than DLN's 9.93% return.
LFEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
DLN
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 22.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
LFEQ vs. DLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 10.63% | 10.49% | 24.30% | 19.66% | -22.05% | 27.97% | 17.56% | 24.07% | -5.55% | 5.27% |
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 9.93% | 15.53% | 19.66% | 9.95% | -3.78% | 25.60% | 4.59% | 28.91% | -5.82% | 5.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and DLN is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between LFEQ and DLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
LFEQ vs. DLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LFEQ
DLN
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LFEQ
DLN
Financial Services
LFEQ
DLN
Communication Services
LFEQ
DLN
Consumer Cyclical
LFEQ
DLN
Healthcare
LFEQ
DLN
Industrials
LFEQ
DLN
Consumer Defensive
LFEQ
DLN
Energy
LFEQ
DLN
Utilities
LFEQ
DLN
Real Estate
LFEQ
DLN
Basic Materials
LFEQ
DLN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. DLN — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
DLN
LFEQ vs. DLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFEQ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.69 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 15.59 | -1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFEQ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.53 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.93 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.53 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. DLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum DLN drawdown of -57.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and DLN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -57.84% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -6.10% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -13.71% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | -16.26% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.51% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -7.52% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.44% | +0.51% |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. DLN - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF (DLN) at 2.17%. This indicates that LFEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | DLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 2.17% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 6.77% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 8.87% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 13.26% | +1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 16.16% | +1.42% |
LFEQ vs. DLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DLN's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. DLN - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than DLN's 1.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DLN WisdomTree US LargeCap Dividend ETF | 1.79% | 1.90% | 2.00% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 2.01% | 2.66% | 2.51% | 2.90% | 2.33% | 2.64% | 2.80% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LFEQ and DLN have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFEQ has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to DLN (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs DLN's -57.84%.
On 5-year performance, DLN leads with 12.22% vs 9.91% for LFEQ. On fees, DLN is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DLN has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DLN has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLN is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.
DLN has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.
LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while DLN tracks WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.28% for DLN.
DLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFEQ and DLN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer