LEXI vs. TBFG
LEXI (Alexis Practical Tactical ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LEXI returned 27.43% vs 21.05% for TBFG. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LEXI charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.
Performance
LEXI vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEXI achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than TBFG's 7.51% return.
LEXI
- 1D
- -2.01%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 11.23%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TBFG
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 21.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEXI vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF | 11.23% | 19.23% | 17.60% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 7.51% | 14.56% | 10.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEXI and TBFG is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between LEXI and TBFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEXI vs. TBFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEXI
TBFG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
LEXI
TBFG
Industrials
LEXI
TBFG
Financial Services
LEXI
TBFG
Consumer Cyclical
LEXI
TBFG
Communication Services
LEXI
TBFG
Healthcare
LEXI
TBFG
Basic Materials
LEXI
TBFG
Consumer Defensive
LEXI
TBFG
Utilities
LEXI
TBFG
Energy
LEXI
TBFG
Real Estate
LEXI
TBFG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEXI vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank
LEXI
TBFG
LEXI vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEXI | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.77 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.32 | 11.91 | +4.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEXI | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 2.09 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.25 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
LEXI vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEXI drawdown since its inception was -22.01%, which is greater than TBFG's maximum drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEXI and TBFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEXI | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.01% | -13.43% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | -7.63% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -2.92% | +0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -1.63% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 1.77% | -0.08% |
Volatility
LEXI vs. TBFG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alexis Practical Tactical ETF (LEXI) is 3.37%, while The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that LEXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEXI | TBFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 3.87% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.05% | 8.46% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.85% | 10.11% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 11.07% | +3.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 11.07% | +3.59% |
LEXI vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEXI has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEXI vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison
LEXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than TBFG's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEXI Alexis Practical Tactical ETF | 0.85% | 0.94% | 2.17% | 1.34% | 0.95% | 0.23% |
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF | 2.41% | 2.65% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, LEXI and TBFG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TBFG has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to LEXI (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEXI dropped -22.01% vs TBFG's -13.43%.
On 1-year performance, LEXI leads with 27.43% vs 21.05% for TBFG. On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, LEXI has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LEXI has performed better with a 27.43% return vs 21.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for LEXI.
TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 0.85% for LEXI.
They also come from different issuers: Alexis and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for LEXI and 0.42% for TBFG.
LEXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEXI and TBFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer