LEVI vs. F
LEVI (Levi Strauss & Co.) and F (Ford Motor Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LEVI in Apparel Manufacturing, F in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, LEVI returned 0.38%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for F. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEVI vs. F - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEVI achieves a 20.51% return, which is significantly higher than F's 17.75% return.
LEVI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 25.72%
- YTD
- 20.51%
- 1Y
- 30.78%
- 3Y*
- 21.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.57%
F
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 11.30%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 1Y
- 46.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $936.56M | $781.81M | $926.29M | |
| $56.03M | $77.00M | $65.19M |
LEVI vs. F - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co. | 20.51% | 23.42% | 7.50% | 9.99% | -36.47% | 25.91% | 5.18% | -12.51% |
F Ford Motor Company | 17.75% | 42.35% | -13.10% | 10.18% | -42.18% | 137.48% | -3.88% | 14.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEVI and F is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.47 |
Fundamentals
LEVI:
$9.59B
F:
$58.54B
LEVI:
$1.62
F:
-$1.84
LEVI:
1.46
F:
0.31
LEVI:
4.20
F:
1.64
LEVI:
$6.61B
F:
$187.97B
LEVI:
$4.08B
F:
$20.25B
LEVI:
$906.60M
F:
-$907.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEVI vs. F — Risk / Return Rank
LEVI
F
LEVI vs. F - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Ford Motor Company (F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEVI | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 1.85 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.41 | 3.96 | -1.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEVI vs. F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEVI drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum F drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEVI and F.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEVI | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -97.07% | +37.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.40% | -23.39% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.47% | -36.51% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.82% | -58.62% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.51% | -33.40% | +25.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -44.68% | +14.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.56% | 10.89% | +0.67% |
Volatility
LEVI vs. F - Volatility Comparison
Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) has a higher volatility of 9.72% compared to Ford Motor Company (F) at 8.28%. This indicates that LEVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEVI | F | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.72% | 8.28% | +1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.36% | 29.76% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.67% | 37.38% | -2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.38% | 39.35% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.29% | 37.42% | +5.87% |
Dividends
LEVI vs. F - Dividend Comparison
LEVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than F's 6.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F Ford Motor Company | 6.85% | 5.72% | 7.88% | 4.92% | 4.30% | 0.48% | 1.71% | 6.45% | 9.54% | 5.20% | 7.01% | 4.26% |
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co. | 2.37% | 2.60% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 2.84% | 1.04% | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LEVI vs. F - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Levi Strauss & Co. and Ford Motor Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEVI vs. F - Profitability Comparison
LEVI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Levi Strauss & Co. reported a gross profit of 979.10M and revenue of 1.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.7%.
F - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a gross profit of 6.08B and revenue of 48.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.
LEVI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Levi Strauss & Co. reported an operating income of 122.20M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.8%.
F - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported an operating income of 638.00M and revenue of 48.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.
LEVI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Levi Strauss & Co. reported a net income of 87.30M and revenue of 1.56B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
F - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ford Motor Company reported a net income of -1.33B and revenue of 48.30B, resulting in a net margin of -2.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEVI and F have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEVI has higher volatility (9.72%) compared to F (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEVI dropped -59.85% vs F's -97.07%.
F currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEVI and F
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer