PortfoliosLab logo
LEVI vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LEVI and ET is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LEVI vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-16.13%
86.77%
LEVI
ET

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LEVI:

-0.51

ET:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

LEVI:

-0.50

ET:

0.90

Omega Ratio

LEVI:

0.93

ET:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

LEVI:

-0.40

ET:

0.59

Martin Ratio

LEVI:

-0.90

ET:

1.97

Ulcer Index

LEVI:

24.57%

ET:

7.37%

Daily Std Dev

LEVI:

43.20%

ET:

27.18%

Max Drawdown

LEVI:

-59.85%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

LEVI:

-39.57%

ET:

-18.58%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEVI:

$6.44B

ET:

$57.20B

EPS

LEVI:

$0.90

ET:

$1.28

PE Ratio

LEVI:

18.10

ET:

13.02

PS Ratio

LEVI:

1.01

ET:

0.67

PB Ratio

LEVI:

3.15

ET:

1.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEVI:

$6.33B

ET:

$61.04B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEVI:

$3.86B

ET:

$10.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEVI:

$649.90M

ET:

$11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEVI achieves a -2.83% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -12.38% return.


LEVI

YTD

-2.83%

1M

23.62%

6M

-1.29%

1Y

-22.91%

5Y*

7.56%

10Y*

N/A

ET

YTD

-12.38%

1M

6.43%

6M

0.39%

1Y

12.80%

5Y*

27.39%

10Y*

1.12%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEVI vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEVI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEVI is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEVI is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEVI is 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEVI is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEVI is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEVI is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LEVI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LEVI Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEVI and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.51
0.53
LEVI
ET

Dividends

LEVI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

LEVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than ET's 7.61% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
3.87%2.89%2.90%2.84%1.04%0.80%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.61%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

LEVI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEVI drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEVI and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-39.57%
-18.58%
LEVI
ET

Volatility

LEVI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) has a higher volatility of 22.54% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 14.09%. This indicates that LEVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
22.54%
14.09%
LEVI
ET

Financials

LEVI vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Levi Strauss & Co. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
1.53B
19.54B
(LEVI) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEVI vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Levi Strauss & Co. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
62.1%
21.0%
(LEVI) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
LEVI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Levi Strauss & Co. reported a gross profit of 947.60M and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.1%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.10B and revenue of 19.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.

LEVI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Levi Strauss & Co. reported an operating income of 191.60M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.28B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.7%.

LEVI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Levi Strauss & Co. reported a net income of 135.00M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 19.54B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.