LEVI vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEVI or ET.
Key characteristics
| LEVI | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 33.87% | 20.40% |
| 1Y Return | 61.27% | 39.37% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -7.89% | 28.19% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 1.48% | 10.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.74 | 2.76 |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.14% | 14.94% |
| Max Drawdown | -59.85% | -87.81% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.56% | -3.14% |
Fundamentals
| LEVI | ET | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $8.76B | $53.51B |
| EPS | $0.30 | $1.09 |
| PE Ratio | 73.33 | 14.58 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.05B | $78.59B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $3.55B | $13.42B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $678.50M | $12.69B |
Correlation
The correlation between LEVI and ET is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LEVI vs. ET - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LEVI achieves a 33.87% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 20.40% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LEVI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LEVI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
LEVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than ET's 5.77% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co. | 2.18% | 2.90% | 2.84% | 1.04% | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 5.77% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
LEVI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEVI drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEVI and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LEVI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.99%. This indicates that LEVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LEVI vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Levi Strauss & Co. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities