LEVI vs. ET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LEVI (Levi Strauss & Co.) and ET (Energy Transfer LP) are both stocks. LEVI operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 5 years, LEVI returned -0.23%/yr vs 21.90%/yr for ET. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LEVI vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEVI achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 22.86% return.

LEVI

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 2.40%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 6M: 2.08%
• 1Y: 36.08%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: -0.23%
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 22.86%
• 6M: 21.25%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 24.39%
• 5Y*: 21.90%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEVI vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co.	10.45%	23.42%	7.50%	9.99%	-36.47%	25.91%	5.18%	-13.25%
ET Energy Transfer LP	22.86%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	-11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LEVI and ET is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2019	0.27

Over the past year, the correlation between LEVI and ET has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LEVI : $8.92B ET : $67.59B
EPS LEVI : $1.56 ET : $1.36
PE Ratio LEVI : 14.51 ET : 14.36
PS Ratio LEVI : 1.38 ET : 0.78
PB Ratio LEVI : 4.04 ET : 1.36
Total Revenue (TTM) LEVI : $6.50B ET : $89.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) LEVI : $4.01B ET : $20.48B
EBITDA (TTM) LEVI : $850.90M ET : $13.02B

Return for Risk

LEVI vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEVI

LEVI Risk / Return Rank: 68
LEVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
LEVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LEVI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
LEVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
LEVI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 69
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 64
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEVI vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEVI	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.09	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	1.69	-0.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.19	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	1.77	-0.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	3.90	-0.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEVI vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEVI Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEVI and ET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEVI	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	1.09	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.89	-0.89
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.36	-0.31

Drawdowns

LEVI vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEVI drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEVI and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEVI	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.85%	-87.81%	+27.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.40%	-10.02%	-16.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.47%	-24.56%	-22.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.74%	-25.82%	-28.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.23%	-4.12%	-11.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.17%	-25.75%	-4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.70%	4.55%	+7.15%

Volatility

LEVI vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) has a higher volatility of 9.08% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 5.97%. This indicates that LEVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEVI	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.08%	5.97%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.63%	11.89%	+12.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.85%	16.42%	+19.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.57%	24.90%	+14.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.52%	35.04%	+8.48%

Dividends

LEVI vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

LEVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than ET's 6.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.83%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%
LEVI Levi Strauss & Co.	2.48%	2.60%	2.89%	2.90%	2.84%	1.04%	0.80%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

LEVI vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Levi Strauss & Co. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LEVI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Levi Strauss & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 1.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.9%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

LEVI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Levi Strauss & Co. reported an operating income of 198.70M and revenue of 1.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

LEVI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Levi Strauss & Co. reported a net income of 175.80M and revenue of 1.74B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEVI and ET in my portfolio?

LEVI and ET have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEVI or ET?

LEVI has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to ET (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEVI dropped -59.85% vs ET's -87.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.