LEVI vs. LULU

In the year-to-date period, LEVI achieves a -6.76% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -29.78% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LEVI Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is comparable to the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEVI and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LEVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, while LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum LEVI drawdown since its inception was -59.85%, smaller than the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEVI and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI) has a higher volatility of 28.27% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 24.07%. This indicates that LEVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Levi Strauss & Co. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.