PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEU vs. CRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LEU vs. CRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -33.03% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 78.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LEU has outperformed CRS with an annualized return of 47.52%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively lower 35.01% annualized return.


LEU

1D
2.46%
1M
-10.96%
YTD
-33.03%
6M
-34.71%
1Y
0.21%
3Y*
68.75%
5Y*
43.53%
10Y*
47.52%

CRS

1D
-0.17%
1M
37.31%
YTD
78.53%
6M
74.76%
1Y
126.36%
3Y*
121.69%
5Y*
68.28%
10Y*
35.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEU vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
-33.03%264.45%22.42%67.52%-34.92%115.78%236.19%307.10%-57.86%-37.15%
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
78.53%86.23%141.72%94.48%29.50%2.66%-39.44%42.12%-29.16%43.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LEU and CRS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 1998

0.29

The correlation between LEU and CRS shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (10 years) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEU:

$3.65B

CRS:

$28.24B

EPS

LEU:

$2.89

CRS:

$9.51

PE Ratio

LEU:

56.19

CRS:

59.07

PS Ratio

LEU:

7.53

CRS:

9.34

PB Ratio

LEU:

4.71

CRS:

13.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEU:

$452.30M

CRS:

$3.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEU:

$116.10M

CRS:

$900.50M

EBITDA (TTM)

LEU:

$70.50M

CRS:

$745.50M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEU vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEU
LEU Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
LEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEU Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
LEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEU Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CRS
CRS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRS Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEU vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEUCRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.44

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.04

6.68

-6.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.07

15.72

-15.65

LEU vs. CRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEU Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the CRS Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEU and CRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEU vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than CRS's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and CRS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEUCRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-84.68%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.37%

-19.08%

-47.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.37%

-28.74%

-37.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.23%

-41.86%

-36.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.84%

-74.70%

-9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.60%

-0.17%

-97.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.98%

-27.23%

-46.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.60%

8.09%

+30.51%

Volatility

LEU vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison

Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 24.20% compared to Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) at 12.83%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEUCRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.20%

12.83%

+11.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

66.53%

33.92%

+32.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

91.26%

48.29%

+42.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.35%

46.70%

+39.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.30%

48.88%

+33.42%

Dividends

LEU vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison

LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
0.14%0.25%0.47%1.13%2.17%2.74%2.75%1.61%2.13%1.41%1.99%2.38%
LEU
Centrus Energy Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LEU vs. CRS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrus Energy Corp. and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
76.70M
811.50M
(LEU) Total Revenue
(CRS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEU vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Centrus Energy Corp. and Carpenter Technology Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
41.1%
31.0%
Portfolio components
LEU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.

CRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

LEU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.

CRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

LEU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

CRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LEU and CRS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEU has higher volatility (24.20%) compared to CRS (12.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs CRS's -84.68%.

CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEU and CRS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer