LEG vs. FRT
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and FRT (Federal Realty Investment Trust) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while FRT operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -10.21%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for FRT. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEG vs. FRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's 26.38% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed FRT with an annualized return of -10.21%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively higher 1.47% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- 4.76%
- 1M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- -23.99%
- 5Y*
- -23.11%
- 10Y*
- -10.21%
FRT
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 26.38%
- 6M
- 24.49%
- 1Y
- 35.38%
- 3Y*
- 15.92%
- 5Y*
- 5.01%
- 10Y*
- 1.47%
LEG vs. FRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 5.01% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 26.38% | -5.91% | 12.07% | 6.55% | -22.66% | 65.97% | -30.66% | 12.51% | -8.10% | -3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and FRT is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.33 |
The correlation between LEG and FRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.61B
FRT:
$10.80B
LEG:
$1.60
FRT:
$5.87
LEG:
7.15
FRT:
21.24
LEG:
0.53
FRT:
8.20
LEG:
1.55
FRT:
3.43
LEG:
$3.03B
FRT:
$1.31B
LEG:
$717.40M
FRT:
$703.03M
LEG:
$433.10M
FRT:
$1.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. FRT — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
FRT
LEG vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 5.10 | -4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 12.97 | -11.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and FRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -57.42% | -28.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -6.96% | -21.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.78% | -27.38% | -49.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.96% | -34.99% | -49.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -56.47% | -29.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.71% | -0.97% | -74.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.69% | -11.77% | -7.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.96% | 2.75% | +11.21% |
Volatility
LEG vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.48% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 4.93%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | FRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.48% | 4.93% | +6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.77% | 12.05% | +19.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.89% | 17.35% | +32.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 23.32% | +19.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.86% | 29.47% | +10.39% |
Dividends
LEG vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than FRT's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 3.60% | 4.39% | 2.93% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.75% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
LEG vs. FRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and FRT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.48%) compared to FRT (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs FRT's -57.42%.
FRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and FRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer