LEG vs. FRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEG or FRT.
Key characteristics
| LEG | FRT | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -46.92% | 2.90% |
| 1Y Return | -54.74% | 14.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -32.08% | 1.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -15.61% | -0.66% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -4.73% | 2.30% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.36 | 0.63 |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.28% | 22.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -73.07% | -57.42% |
| Current Drawdown | -72.44% | -17.75% |
Fundamentals
| LEG | FRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.41B | $8.54B |
| EPS | -$1.00 | $2.80 |
| PE Ratio | 14.75 | 36.50 |
| PEG Ratio | -4.11 | 3.79 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.73B | $1.14B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $976.80M | $730.58M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $505.40M | $709.79M |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and FRT is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LEG vs. FRT - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -46.92% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed FRT with an annualized return of -4.73%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively higher 2.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LEG vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LEG vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.57%, more than FRT's 4.15% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 13.57% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% | 2.86% | 3.81% |
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 4.15% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% | 2.47% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
LEG vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -73.07%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LEG vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 31.89% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 5.96%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LEG vs. FRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities