LEG vs. FRT
Compare and contrast key facts about Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LEG or FRT.
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and FRT is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LEG vs. FRT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LEG:
-1.24
FRT:
0.74
LEG:
-2.03
FRT:
1.10
LEG:
0.72
FRT:
1.14
LEG:
-0.77
FRT:
0.53
LEG:
-1.39
FRT:
4.29
LEG:
44.50%
FRT:
3.03%
LEG:
49.70%
FRT:
17.69%
LEG:
-80.05%
FRT:
-57.42%
LEG:
-80.05%
FRT:
-10.44%
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.45B
FRT:
$9.79B
LEG:
-$6.01
FRT:
$3.44
LEG:
-4.11
FRT:
4.72
LEG:
$4.44B
FRT:
$1.18B
LEG:
$744.70M
FRT:
$712.23M
LEG:
-$690.10M
FRT:
$801.54M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -61.58% return, which is significantly lower than FRT's 12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed FRT with an annualized return of -10.33%, while FRT has yielded a comparatively higher 1.58% annualized return.
LEG
-61.58%
-13.72%
-19.10%
-62.30%
-25.10%
-10.33%
FRT
12.04%
-1.09%
12.72%
11.70%
1.63%
1.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LEG vs. FRT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LEG vs. FRT - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than FRT's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 6.30% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% | 2.86% | 3.81% |
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust | 3.90% | 4.21% | 4.26% | 3.12% | 4.96% | 3.22% | 3.42% | 2.98% | 2.70% | 2.48% | 2.47% | 2.98% |
Drawdowns
LEG vs. FRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -80.05%, which is greater than FRT's maximum drawdown of -57.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and FRT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LEG vs. FRT - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) at 5.87%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LEG vs. FRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Federal Realty Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities