LE vs. L
LE (Lands' End, Inc.) and L (Loews Corporation) are both stocks. LE operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while L operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, LE returned -3.68%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LE vs. L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LE achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than L's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LE has underperformed L with an annualized return of -3.68%, while L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.
LE
- 1D
- -5.05%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- -22.38%
- 6M
- -32.47%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- -20.32%
- 10Y*
- -3.68%
L
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 16.84%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
LE vs. L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LE Lands' End, Inc. | -22.38% | 10.50% | 37.45% | 25.96% | -61.33% | -8.99% | 28.39% | 18.23% | -27.31% | 29.04% |
L Loews Corporation | -0.69% | 24.68% | 22.09% | 19.78% | 1.41% | 28.89% | -13.69% | 15.89% | -8.56% | 8.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LE and L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
LE:
$348.81M
L:
$21.55B
LE:
$0.18
L:
$8.96
LE:
63.18
L:
11.65
LE:
3.57
L:
0.68
LE:
0.26
L:
1.19
LE:
1.43
L:
1.15
LE:
$1.34B
L:
$18.29B
LE:
$650.17M
L:
$8.42B
LE:
$76.04M
L:
$2.64B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LE vs. L — Risk / Return Rank
LE
L
LE vs. L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and Loews Corporation (L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LE | L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.19 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 2.12 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 5.62 | -3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LE | L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.06 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.66 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.42 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.33 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
LE vs. L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LE drawdown since its inception was -92.49%, which is greater than L's maximum drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LE and L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LE | L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.49% | -65.58% | -26.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.31% | -7.99% | -39.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.11% | -12.16% | -48.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.84% | -26.11% | -59.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.09% | -48.53% | -37.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.64% | -7.18% | -72.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.70% | -16.75% | -48.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.66% | 3.01% | +16.65% |
Volatility
LE vs. L - Volatility Comparison
Lands' End, Inc. (LE) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to Loews Corporation (L) at 4.68%. This indicates that LE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LE | L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.33% | 4.68% | +8.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.12% | 12.48% | +39.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.05% | 15.88% | +53.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.84% | 19.61% | +49.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.36% | 25.63% | +47.73% |
Dividends
LE vs. L - Dividend Comparison
LE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L Loews Corporation | 0.24% | 0.24% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.43% | 0.56% | 0.48% | 0.55% | 1.58% | 0.53% | 0.65% |
LE Lands' End, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LE vs. L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lands' End, Inc. and Loews Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LE vs. L - Profitability Comparison
LE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.97M and revenue of 462.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.
L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.
LE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.43M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported an operating income of 539.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
LE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a net income of 12.27M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported a net income of 572.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LE and L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LE has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to L (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LE dropped -92.49% vs L's -65.58%.
L currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LE and L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer