LE vs. MPLX
LE (Lands' End, Inc.) and MPLX (MPLX LP) are both stocks. LE operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while MPLX operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LE returned -3.68%/yr vs 14.99%/yr for MPLX. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LE vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LE achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than MPLX's 7.63% return. Over the past 10 years, LE has underperformed MPLX with an annualized return of -3.68%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.99% annualized return.
LE
- 1D
- -5.05%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- -22.38%
- 6M
- -32.47%
- 1Y
- 32.12%
- 3Y*
- 7.63%
- 5Y*
- -20.32%
- 10Y*
- -3.68%
MPLX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 7.63%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- 15.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 24.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.99%
LE vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LE Lands' End, Inc. | -22.38% | 10.50% | 37.45% | 25.96% | -61.33% | -8.99% | 28.39% | 18.23% | -27.31% | 29.04% |
MPLX MPLX LP | 7.63% | 20.54% | 41.72% | 22.46% | 21.09% | 53.92% | -1.79% | -8.25% | -8.43% | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LE and MPLX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
LE:
$0.18
MPLX:
$6.16
LE:
63.18
MPLX:
8.97
LE:
3.57
MPLX:
0.62
LE:
0.26
MPLX:
3.37
LE:
$1.34B
MPLX:
$12.54B
LE:
$650.17M
MPLX:
$7.52B
LE:
$76.04M
MPLX:
$6.90B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LE vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank
LE
MPLX
LE vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LE | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.17 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 2.01 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 4.73 | -3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LE | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.99 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 1.26 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.05 | 0.49 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.39 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
LE vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LE drawdown since its inception was -92.49%, which is greater than MPLX's maximum drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LE and MPLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LE | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.49% | -85.72% | -6.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.31% | -7.71% | -39.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.11% | -14.58% | -46.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.84% | -18.46% | -67.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.09% | -75.21% | -10.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.64% | -4.79% | -74.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.70% | -30.01% | -35.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.66% | 3.27% | +16.39% |
Volatility
LE vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison
Lands' End, Inc. (LE) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 5.51%. This indicates that LE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LE | MPLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.33% | 5.51% | +7.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.12% | 11.65% | +40.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.05% | 15.59% | +53.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.84% | 19.40% | +49.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.36% | 30.66% | +42.70% |
Dividends
LE vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison
LE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LE Lands' End, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPLX MPLX LP | 7.58% | 7.39% | 7.33% | 8.65% | 8.80% | 11.30% | 12.70% | 10.41% | 8.22% | 6.23% | 5.86% | 4.33% |
Financials
LE vs. MPLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lands' End, Inc. and MPLX LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LE vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison
LE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.97M and revenue of 462.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.
MPLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 2.64B and revenue of 3.04B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
LE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.43M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.
MPLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.21B and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.
LE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a net income of 12.27M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.
MPLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 922.00M and revenue of 3.04B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LE and MPLX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LE has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to MPLX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LE dropped -92.49% vs MPLX's -85.72%.
MPLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LE and MPLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer