LE vs. MPLX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and MPLX LP (MPLX).

Performance

LE vs. MPLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and MPLX LP (MPLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LE vs. MPLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LE Lands' End, Inc.	-22.59%	10.50%	37.45%	25.96%	-61.33%	-8.99%	28.39%	18.23%	-27.31%	29.04%
MPLX MPLX LP	9.03%	20.54%	41.72%	22.46%	21.09%	53.92%	-1.79%	-8.25%	-8.43%	9.00%

Fundamentals

EPS LE : $0.18 MPLX : $7.24
PE Ratio LE : 63.01 MPLX : 7.88
PEG Ratio LE : 3.56 MPLX : 0.14
PS Ratio LE : 0.26 MPLX : 2.98
Total Revenue (TTM) LE : $1.34B MPLX : $13.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) LE : $650.17M MPLX : $4.69B
EBITDA (TTM) LE : $76.04M MPLX : $6.31B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LE achieves a -22.59% return, which is significantly lower than MPLX's 9.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LE has underperformed MPLX with an annualized return of -7.66%, while MPLX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.19% annualized return.

LE

• 1D: -4.26%
• 1M: -30.06%
• YTD: -22.59%
• 6M: -20.28%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: 4.96%
• 5Y*: -14.51%
• 10Y*: -7.66%

MPLX

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 18.98%
• 1Y: 15.36%
• 3Y*: 28.58%
• 5Y*: 27.90%
• 10Y*: 17.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LE vs. MPLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LE

LE Risk / Return Rank: 47
LE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LE Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LE Omega Ratio Rank: 48
LE Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LE Martin Ratio Rank: 48

MPLX

MPLX Risk / Return Rank: 66
MPLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MPLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
MPLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MPLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LE vs. MPLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and MPLX LP (MPLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LE	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	0.82	-0.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	1.19	-0.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.16	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.18	1.07	-0.89
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.57	3.80	-3.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LE vs. MPLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LE Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the MPLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LE and MPLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LE	MPLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	0.82	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21	1.44	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.56	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.13	0.39	-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between LE and MPLX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LE vs. MPLX - Dividend Comparison

LE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.12%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LE Lands' End, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPLX MPLX LP	7.12%	7.39%	7.33%	8.65%	8.80%	11.30%	12.70%	10.41%	8.22%	6.23%	5.86%	4.33%

Drawdowns

LE vs. MPLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LE drawdown since its inception was -92.49%, which is greater than MPLX's maximum drawdown of -85.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LE and MPLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LE	MPLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.49%	-85.72%	-6.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.31%	-13.38%	-27.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.84%	-18.46%	-67.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.09%	-75.21%	-10.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.70%	-3.55%	-76.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-65.50%	-30.33%	-35.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.90%	3.75%	+9.15%

Volatility

LE vs. MPLX - Volatility Comparison

Lands' End, Inc. (LE) has a higher volatility of 22.85% compared to MPLX LP (MPLX) at 3.97%. This indicates that LE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LE	MPLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.85%	3.97%	+18.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.17%	11.15%	+41.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.26%	18.89%	+52.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.37%	19.54%	+49.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.29%	30.91%	+42.38%

Financials

LE vs. MPLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lands' End, Inc. and MPLX LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.97M and revenue of 462.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

MPLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.43M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

MPLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported an operating income of 1.48B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.0%.

LE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a net income of 12.27M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

MPLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MPLX LP reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.70B, resulting in a net margin of 32.5%.