PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LE vs. TJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LE vs. TJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LE achieves a -22.38% return, which is significantly lower than TJX's 3.42% return. Over the past 10 years, LE has underperformed TJX with an annualized return of -3.68%, while TJX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.87% annualized return.


LE

1D
-5.05%
1M
4.06%
YTD
-22.38%
6M
-32.47%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
-20.32%
10Y*
-3.68%

TJX

1D
2.74%
1M
2.44%
YTD
3.42%
6M
5.87%
1Y
24.75%
3Y*
28.13%
5Y*
20.94%
10Y*
16.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LE vs. TJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LE
Lands' End, Inc.
-22.38%10.50%37.45%25.96%-61.33%-8.99%28.39%18.23%-27.31%29.04%
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.
3.42%28.73%30.56%19.69%6.73%12.83%12.25%38.76%18.94%3.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LE and TJX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2014

0.30

The correlation between LE and TJX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LE:

$348.81M

TJX:

$176.85B

EPS

LE:

$0.18

TJX:

$5.15

PE Ratio

LE:

63.18

TJX:

30.67

PEG Ratio

LE:

3.57

TJX:

1.93

PS Ratio

LE:

0.26

TJX:

2.88

PB Ratio

LE:

1.43

TJX:

4.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

LE:

$1.34B

TJX:

$61.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LE:

$650.17M

TJX:

$19.36B

EBITDA (TTM)

LE:

$76.04M

TJX:

$8.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LE vs. TJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LE
LE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TJX
TJX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
TJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LE vs. TJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lands' End, Inc. (LE) and The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LETJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.25

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

2.28

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.64

7.90

-6.26

LE vs. TJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LE Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the TJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LE and TJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LETJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

1.40

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.94

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

0.65

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

0.54

-0.66

Drawdowns

LE vs. TJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LE drawdown since its inception was -92.49%, which is greater than TJX's maximum drawdown of -64.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LE and TJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LETJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.49%

-64.59%

-27.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.31%

-10.89%

-36.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.11%

-11.04%

-50.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.84%

-27.68%

-58.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.09%

-42.55%

-43.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-79.64%

-3.99%

-75.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.70%

-13.08%

-52.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.66%

3.14%

+16.52%

Volatility

LE vs. TJX - Volatility Comparison

Lands' End, Inc. (LE) has a higher volatility of 13.33% compared to The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) at 8.18%. This indicates that LE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LETJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.33%

8.18%

+5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.12%

14.02%

+38.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.05%

17.77%

+51.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.84%

22.29%

+46.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.36%

26.04%

+47.32%

Dividends

LE vs. TJX - Dividend Comparison

LE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LE
Lands' End, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TJX
The TJX Companies, Inc.
1.11%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.44%1.37%0.34%1.45%1.66%1.57%1.32%1.14%

Financials

LE vs. TJX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lands' End, Inc. and The TJX Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
462.37M
14.32B
(LE) Total Revenue
(TJX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LE vs. TJX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lands' End, Inc. and The TJX Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
46.9%
31.3%
Portfolio components
LE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.97M and revenue of 462.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.9%.

TJX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The TJX Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 14.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.3%.

LE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported an operating income of 24.43M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.3%.

TJX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The TJX Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.69B and revenue of 14.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

LE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lands' End, Inc. reported a net income of 12.27M and revenue of 462.37M, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.

TJX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The TJX Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 14.32B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LE and TJX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LE has higher volatility (13.33%) compared to TJX (8.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LE dropped -92.49% vs TJX's -64.59%.

TJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LE and TJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer