PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRT vs. TLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRT achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -0.27% return.


LDRT

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.72%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.81%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
4.93%
3Y*
-1.80%
5Y*
-6.31%
10Y*
-1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
0.72%5.55%0.44%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
-0.27%4.25%-4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRT and TLT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.56

The correlation between LDRT and TLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRT
LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

TLT
TLT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDRTTLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

0.65

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.35

1.63

+7.72

LDRT vs. TLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the TLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRT and TLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDRTTLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.51

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.55

0.26

+1.30

Drawdowns

LDRT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRT drawdown since its inception was -1.11%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRT and TLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRTTLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.11%

-48.35%

+47.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.11%

-7.58%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-40.44%

+39.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-13.82%

+13.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

3.04%

-2.62%

Volatility

LDRT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) is 0.88%, while iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that LDRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRTTLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

2.76%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.65%

6.50%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80%

9.77%

-6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

15.87%

-13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.79%

14.91%

-12.12%

LDRT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDRT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison

LDRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.09%, less than TLT's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LDRT
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF
4.09%3.86%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.59%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRT and TLT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLT has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to LDRT (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRT dropped -1.11% vs TLT's -48.35%.

On 1-year performance, TLT leads with 4.93% vs 3.88% for LDRT. On fees, LDRT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, LDRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TLT has performed better with a 4.93% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TLT.

TLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 4.09% for LDRT.

LDRT tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder Index, while TLT tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LDRT and 0.15% for TLT.

LDRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRT and TLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer