LDRT vs. NBSD

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LDRT (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF) and NBSD (Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDRT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder Index, while NBSD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. LDRT is passively managed, while NBSD is actively managed. Over the past year, LDRT returned 3.49% vs 4.26% for NBSD. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDRT charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NBSD.

Performance

LDRT vs. NBSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRT achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than NBSD's 0.85% return.

LDRT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 3.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NBSD

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 0.85%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 4.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRT vs. NBSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LDRT iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF	0.74%	5.55%	0.44%
NBSD Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF	0.85%	6.18%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LDRT and NBSD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024	0.36

Return for Risk

LDRT vs. NBSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRT

LDRT Risk / Return Rank: 46
LDRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LDRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
LDRT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
LDRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
LDRT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

NBSD

NBSD Risk / Return Rank: 88
NBSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
NBSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
NBSD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
NBSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
NBSD Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRT vs. NBSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) and Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LDRT	NBSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.94	-1.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	4.69	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.63	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	3.61	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.16	18.53	-10.37

LDRT vs. NBSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the NBSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRT and NBSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LDRT vs. NBSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRT drawdown since its inception was -1.11%, smaller than the maximum NBSD drawdown of -2.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRT and NBSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	LDRT	NBSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.11%	-2.63%	+1.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.11%	-1.19%	+0.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.50%	-0.24%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-0.23%	-0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.43%	0.23%	+0.20%

Volatility

LDRT vs. NBSD - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF (LDRT) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF (NBSD) at 0.43%. This indicates that LDRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LDRT	NBSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.79%	0.43%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.65%	1.04%	+0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80%	1.46%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.77%	2.76%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.77%	2.76%	+0.01%

LDRT vs. NBSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRT has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NBSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LDRT vs. NBSD - Dividend Comparison

LDRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, less than NBSD's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
LDRT iShares iBonds 1-5 Year Treasury Ladder ETF	4.08%	3.86%	0.69%
NBSD Neuberger Berman Short Duration Income ETF	4.81%	5.06%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LDRT and NBSD in my portfolio?

LDRT and NBSD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LDRT or NBSD?

LDRT has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to NBSD (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRT dropped -1.11% vs NBSD's -2.63%.

Which ETF is better, LDRT or NBSD?

On 1-year performance, NBSD leads with 4.26% vs 3.49% for LDRT. On fees, LDRT is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, NBSD has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LDRT or NBSD?

Over the 1-year period, NBSD has performed better with a 4.26% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LDRT or NBSD?

LDRT is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for NBSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LDRT or NBSD?

NBSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 4.08% for LDRT.

What is the main difference between LDRT and NBSD?

LDRT is categorized as Government Bonds, while NBSD is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Neuberger Berman. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LDRT and 0.35% for NBSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.