PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRI vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LDRI vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LDRI vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRI achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 1.65% return.


LDRI

1D
0.09%
1M
0.12%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.40%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RBIL

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.03%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LDRI vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LDRI vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRI
LDRI Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
LDRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRI Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRI vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDRIRBILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

3.76

-2.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.43

6.07

-3.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

2.00

-0.65

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

7.98

-3.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.57

35.17

-21.59

LDRI vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 3.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRI and RBIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDRIRBILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

3.76

-2.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.13

4.10

-1.96

Correlation

The correlation between LDRI and RBIL is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LDRI vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than RBIL's 4.42% yield.


Drawdowns

LDRI vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRI drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRI and RBIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRIRBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-0.50%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-0.50%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.08%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.06%

-0.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.11%

+0.18%

Volatility

LDRI vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) have volatilities of 0.58% and 0.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LDRIRBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.58%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.37%

0.67%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24%

1.04%

+1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.37%

1.03%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.37%

1.03%

+1.34%