LDRH vs. MSTZ
LDRH (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDRH is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. LDRH is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, LDRH returned 5.66% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.36, they often move in opposite directions. LDRH charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.
Performance
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDRH achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.
LDRH
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTZ
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 39.32%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- YTD
- -26.97%
- 1Y
- 264.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 2.11% | 7.18% | 0.21% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | -26.97% | -38.95% | -63.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDRH and MSTZ is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | -0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDRH vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank
LDRH
MSTZ
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDRH | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.30 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 2.86 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.16 | 5.59 | +13.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDRH drawdown since its inception was -3.17%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRH and MSTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDRH | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -99.38% | +96.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.23% | -84.89% | +83.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -97.51% | +97.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.23% | -94.53% | +94.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 43.41% | -43.11% |
Volatility
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF (LDRH) is 0.61%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that LDRH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDRH | MSTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 56.46% | -55.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 135.20% | -133.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 148.41% | -145.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 171.17% | -167.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.44% | 171.17% | -167.73% |
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDRH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDRH vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison
LDRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.96%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LDRH iShares iBonds 1-5 Year High Yield and Income Ladder ETF | 6.96% | 6.41% | 1.13% |
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDRH and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to LDRH (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRH dropped -3.17% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.
On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 5.66% for LDRH. On fees, LDRH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LDRH has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDRH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.
LDRH has the higher dividend yield at 6.96%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.
LDRH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for LDRH and 1.05% for MSTZ.
LDRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDRH and MSTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer