LDGL.L vs. KNG
LDGL.L (L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDGL.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LDGL.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LDGL.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 10.88%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.57%
- 10Y*
- —
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 12.26% |
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDGL.L and KNG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDGL.L vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
LDGL.L
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KNG
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDGL.L | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDGL.L drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGL.L and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDGL.L | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -35.12% | +25.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.56% | +2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -4.11% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.43% | — |
Volatility
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDGL.L | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.29% | 10.57% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 13.61% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.29% | 17.13% | -2.84% |
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDGL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDGL.L vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than KNG's 8.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.35% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDGL.L and KNG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDGL.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDGL.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.
LDGL.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while KNG is Dividend. LDGL.L tracks FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. They also come from different issuers: L&G and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LDGL.L and 0.75% for KNG.
Find the right allocation for LDGL.L and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer