LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L).
LDGL.L and RTWO.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LDGL.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the FTSE Developed All Cap Dividend Growth with Quality Index. It was launched on Nov 18, 2025. RTWO.L is a passively managed fund by L&G that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 0.4 Quality Target Exposure Factor Index. It was launched on Sep 11, 2008. Both LDGL.L and RTWO.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LDGL.L L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing | 1.20% |
RTWO.L L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc | -7.27% |
Returns By Period
LDGL.L
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RTWO.L
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDGL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than RTWO.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L — Risk / Return Rank
LDGL.L
RTWO.L
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Global Quality Dividends UCITS ETF USD Distributing (LDGL.L) and L&G Russell 2000 US Small Cap Quality UCITS ETF USD Acc (RTWO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDGL.L | RTWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between LDGL.L and RTWO.L is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Dividend Comparison
LDGL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while RTWO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDGL.L drawdown since its inception was -10.00%, smaller than the maximum RTWO.L drawdown of -42.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDGL.L and RTWO.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDGL.L | RTWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -42.35% | +32.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.61% | -8.72% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -7.96% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.38% | — |
Volatility
LDGL.L vs. RTWO.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LDGL.L | RTWO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.23% | 19.18% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 21.03% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 21.39% | -5.16% |