LDEM vs. PIE
LDEM (iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF) and PIE (Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while PIE is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LDEM returned 1.89%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for PIE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PIE.
Performance
LDEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDEM achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.11% return.
LDEM
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 6.92%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 25.33%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.89%
- 10Y*
- —
PIE
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 39.11%
- 6M
- 38.18%
- 1Y
- 70.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.15%
LDEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 6.92% | 32.49% | 5.87% | 6.49% | -22.46% | -2.03% | 15.59% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 39.11% | 25.98% | -0.27% | 13.71% | -28.77% | 14.30% | 20.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDEM and PIE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between LDEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
LDEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LDEM
PIE
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
LDEM
PIE
Consumer Cyclical
LDEM
PIE
Technology
LDEM
PIE
Communication Services
LDEM
PIE
Industrials
LDEM
PIE
Basic Materials
LDEM
PIE
Energy
LDEM
PIE
Healthcare
LDEM
PIE
Consumer Defensive
LDEM
PIE
Utilities
LDEM
PIE
Real Estate
LDEM
PIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank
LDEM
PIE
LDEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.44 | 3.24 | -1.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.03 | 3.88 | -1.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.55 | -0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 7.18 | -5.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.33 | 23.52 | -17.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 3.24 | -1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 | 0.35 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.12 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
LDEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDEM drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDEM and PIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.82% | -72.98% | +32.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -9.87% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.12% | -28.69% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.17% | -40.32% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -1.17% | -2.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -26.08% | +8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.01% | +1.00% |
Volatility
LDEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF (LDEM) is 6.08%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that LDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDEM | PIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.08% | 9.00% | -2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 17.77% | -3.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.68% | 21.91% | -4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.09% | 20.23% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 21.35% | -0.62% |
LDEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
LDEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison
LDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than PIE's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDEM iShares ESG MSCI EM Leaders ETF | 3.04% | 3.26% | 2.64% | 3.20% | 4.93% | 1.82% | 1.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PIE Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF | 1.70% | 2.28% | 2.33% | 2.59% | 3.45% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 2.29% | 3.32% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 0.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to LDEM (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDEM dropped -40.82% vs PIE's -72.98%.
On 5-year performance, PIE leads with 7.01% vs 1.89% for LDEM. On fees, LDEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, LDEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PIE has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LDEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.
LDEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 1.70% for PIE.
LDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. LDEM tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Leaders 5% Issuer Capped Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for LDEM and 0.90% for PIE.
PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDEM and PIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer