LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) and XDJP.DE (Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - LCUA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while XDJP.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCUA.DE returned 7.30%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for XDJP.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCUA.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for XDJP.DE.

Performance

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCUA.DE achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly lower than XDJP.DE's 26.87% return.

LCUA.DE

• 1D: -2.34%
• 1M: -9.36%
• 6M: 14.48%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 1Y: 34.32%
• 3Y*: 19.89%
• 5Y*: 7.30%
• 10Y*: —

XDJP.DE

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -8.53%
• 6M: 19.27%
• YTD: 26.87%
• 1Y: 51.59%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	21.76%	18.10%	18.44%	3.32%	-14.89%	1.92%	15.54%	22.25%	-10.88%
XDJP.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D	26.87%	16.25%	14.41%	18.07%	-15.32%	3.32%	14.05%	24.79%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018	0.60

The correlation between LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCUA.DE

LCUA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 61
LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
LCUA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
LCUA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LCUA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LCUA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

XDJP.DE

XDJP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 80
XDJP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XDJP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
XDJP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
XDJP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
XDJP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCUA.DE	XDJP.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.00	-0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.82	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.33	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.59	4.00	-1.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	11.24	-2.89

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCUA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the XDJP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCUA.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.14%, which is greater than XDJP.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCUA.DE	XDJP.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.14%	-29.12%	-4.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.17%	-12.83%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.07%	-20.16%	-0.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.02%	-21.14%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-29.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.17%	-12.10%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.92%	-6.77%	-5.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.10%	4.58%	-0.48%

Volatility

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) and Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) have volatilities of 9.85% and 9.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCUA.DE	XDJP.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.85%	9.42%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.34%	20.94%	-0.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.91%	25.75%	-2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.14%	19.16%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.78%	18.00%	+1.78%

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCUA.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than XDJP.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCUA.DE vs. XDJP.DE - Dividend Comparison

LCUA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDJP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XDJP.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D	1.08%	1.36%	1.38%	1.59%	2.60%	1.16%	1.14%	1.11%	1.28%	0.75%	0.89%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE in my portfolio?

LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCUA.DE or XDJP.DE?

On fees, XDJP.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCUA.DE or XDJP.DE?

XDJP.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LCUA.DE.

What is the main difference between LCUA.DE and XDJP.DE?

LCUA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while XDJP.DE is Japan Equities. LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while XDJP.DE tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LCUA.DE and 0.09% for XDJP.DE.