PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDJP.DE vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP).

XDJP.DE and FLJP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDJP.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 25, 2013. FLJP is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2017. Both XDJP.DE and FLJP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDJP.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		8.03%16.25%14.44%18.02%-15.30%3.32%14.02%24.82%-4.99%-0.91%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF		9.14%11.74%14.06%16.40%-11.40%8.55%6.22%21.68%-9.98%-1.13%
Different Trading Currencies

XDJP.DE is traded in EUR, while FLJP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLJP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDJP.DE achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than FLJP's 9.14% return.

XDJP.DE

1D
4.89%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
8.03%
6M
15.00%
1Y
36.21%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
10.56%

FLJP

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.21%
YTD
9.14%
6M
13.44%
1Y
24.68%
3Y*
15.11%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D

Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

Often compared with XDJP.DE:
XDJP.DE vs. EWJXDJP.DE vs. JPXNXDJP.DE vs. IJPH.LXDJP.DE vs. DXJXDJP.DE vs. VOOGXDJP.DE vs. SPYGXDJP.DE vs. VOO
Often compared with FLJP:
FLJP vs. EWJFLJP vs. FLJHFLJP vs. EWJVFLJP vs. DXJFLJP vs. BBJPFLJP vs. JPXNFLJP vs. FLKR

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDJP.DE and FLJP have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XDJP.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF

Return for Risk

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDJP.DE
XDJP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDJP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDJP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDJP.DEFLJPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.16

+0.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

1.67

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.24

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

2.17

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.79

7.18

+1.61

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDJP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDJP.DE and FLJP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDJP.DEFLJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.16

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.48

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.41

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between XDJP.DE and FLJP is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

XDJP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than FLJP's 4.79% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDJP.DE
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D		1.26%1.36%1.38%1.59%2.60%1.16%1.14%1.11%1.28%0.75%0.89%0.16%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF		4.79%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDJP.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, roughly equal to the maximum FLJP drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.DE and FLJP.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XDJP.DEFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.12%

-32.49%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-13.30%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.15%

-32.49%

+11.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-7.59%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-9.48%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

3.50%

+0.66%

Volatility

XDJP.DE vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) has a higher volatility of 9.30% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 7.95%. This indicates that XDJP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XDJP.DEFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.30%

7.95%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.74%

13.77%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

21.30%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

16.61%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

17.44%

+0.14%