XDJP.DE vs. VOOG
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG).
XDJP.DE and VOOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XDJP.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the TOPIX TR JPY. It was launched on Jan 25, 2013. VOOG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both XDJP.DE and VOOG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XDJP.DE or VOOG.
Key characteristics
| XDJP.DE | VOOG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.03% | 24.63% |
| 1Y Return | 10.50% | 31.05% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 0.91% | 7.37% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.07% | 16.61% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 8.81% | 14.64% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.66 | 1.90 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.54% | 16.87% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.12% | -32.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.04% | -3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDJP.DE and VOOG is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XDJP.DE vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XDJP.DE achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 24.63% return. Over the past 10 years, XDJP.DE has underperformed VOOG with an annualized return of 8.81%, while VOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 14.64% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XDJP.DE vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDJP.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than VOOG's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XDJP.DE vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XDJP.DE vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
XDJP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDJP.DE Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D | 0.00% | 0.79% | 2.60% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.11% | 1.28% | 0.75% | 0.89% | 0.16% | 1.40% | 0.43% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.71% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
Drawdowns
XDJP.DE vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDJP.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, smaller than the maximum VOOG drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDJP.DE and VOOG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XDJP.DE vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF 1D (XDJP.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) at 5.55%. This indicates that XDJP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.