LCTU vs. FTSD
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD).
LCTU and FTSD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCTU is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2021. FTSD is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Nov 4, 2013.
Performance
LCTU vs. FTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCTU vs. FTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | -5.13% | 16.96% | 24.00% | 25.38% | -20.02% | 17.49% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 0.40% | 5.66% | 5.20% | 4.84% | -3.13% | -0.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than FTSD's 0.40% return.
LCTU
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -5.13%
- 6M
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 16.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTSD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCTU vs. FTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FTSD's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LCTU vs. FTSD — Risk / Return Rank
LCTU
FTSD
LCTU vs. FTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCTU | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 2.38 | -1.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 3.39 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.60 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 4.85 | -3.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.48 | 22.05 | -15.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCTU | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.38 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.04 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTU and FTSD is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LCTU vs. FTSD - Dividend Comparison
LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than FTSD's 4.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 1.07% | 1.02% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTSD Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF | 4.55% | 4.67% | 4.75% | 4.14% | 1.73% | 1.01% | 1.54% | 2.90% | 2.63% | 2.24% | 1.92% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
LCTU vs. FTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than FTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and FTSD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTU | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.93% | -5.32% | -20.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -0.93% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -5.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.76% | -0.14% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -0.61% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.69% | 0.20% | +2.49% |
Volatility
LCTU vs. FTSD - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Franklin Short Duration U.S. Government ETF (FTSD) at 0.53%. This indicates that LCTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCTU | FTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 0.53% | +4.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | 0.87% | +8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 1.97% | +16.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 1.83% | +15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 1.79% | +15.38% |