PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTU vs. DFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTU vs. DFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF (DFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCTU vs. DFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
-5.13%16.96%24.00%25.38%-20.02%11.94%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF
-4.17%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%11.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a -5.13% return, which is significantly lower than DFUS's -4.17% return.


LCTU

1D
2.89%
1M
-5.09%
YTD
-5.13%
6M
-2.83%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
10Y*

DFUS

1D
2.93%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
-4.17%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
18.39%
3Y*
18.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTU vs. DFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DFUS's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LCTU vs. DFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU
LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. DFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF (DFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTUDFUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

1.00

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.52

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.54

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.48

7.30

-0.83

LCTU vs. DFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the DFUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and DFUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTUDFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

1.00

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.61

-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and DFUS is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LCTU vs. DFUS - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than DFUS's 0.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.07%1.02%1.27%1.46%1.63%2.20%
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF
0.97%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. DFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than DFUS's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and DFUS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTUDFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-24.62%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-12.31%

-0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.76%

-6.29%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-6.00%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.60%

+0.09%

Volatility

LCTU vs. DFUS - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Dimensional U.S. Equity ETF (DFUS) have volatilities of 5.40% and 5.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCTUDFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

5.45%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.84%

9.77%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

18.53%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.38%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

17.38%

-0.21%