LCTD vs. SPYG

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

LCTD (BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. LCTD is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCTD returned 7.61%/yr vs 13.61%/yr for SPYG. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LCTD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.

Performance

LCTD vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 12.43% return.

LCTD

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 4.47%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.10%

SPYG

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 2.10%
• 6M: 11.46%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 25.98%
• 5Y*: 13.61%
• 10Y*: 17.52%
• ALL TIME*: 7.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	$320.78K	$394.26K	$1.78M
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	$323.67M	$273.71M	$308.17M

LCTD vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	9.67%	30.42%	3.14%	17.10%	-16.16%	4.48%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	12.43%	22.09%	35.99%	30.02%	-29.41%	24.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and SPYG is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021	0.68

The correlation between LCTD and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCTD vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCTD	SPYG
Financial Services	27.8%	8.7%
Industrials	17.3%	6.4%
Technology	10.8%	52.3%
Healthcare	9.6%	6.2%
Basic Materials	7.2%	0.3%
Consumer Cyclical	6.2%	8.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.7%	1.0%
Energy	5.3%	0.1%
Utilities	3.6%	0.4%
Communication Services	3.1%	15.6%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.6%

Return for Risk

LCTD vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 60
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 59

SPYG

SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 53
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCTD vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCTD	SPYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.34	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	1.93	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.24	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	1.78	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.32	6.45	+0.87

LCTD vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and SPYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTD	SPYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.82%	-67.63%	+37.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-13.76%	+2.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.59%	-22.14%	+8.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.82%	-32.67%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-2.28%	+1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-24.20%	+17.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	3.78%	-0.65%

Volatility

LCTD vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 4.25%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTD	SPYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.25%	6.35%	-2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.84%	14.96%	-2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	18.23%	-3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	21.53%	-5.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.04%	20.81%	-4.77%

LCTD vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LCTD vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.31%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.48%	0.52%	0.60%	1.15%	1.03%	0.62%	0.90%	1.37%	1.51%	1.41%	1.55%	1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTD and SPYG in my portfolio?

LCTD and SPYG have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTD or SPYG?

SPYG has higher volatility (6.35%) compared to LCTD (4.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

Which ETF is better, LCTD or SPYG?

On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 13.61% vs 7.61% for LCTD. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, LCTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTD or SPYG?

Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 13.61% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTD or SPYG?

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LCTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTD or SPYG?

LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

What is the main difference between LCTD and SPYG?

LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.04% for SPYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.