LCTD vs. VOO
LCTD (BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. LCTD is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCTD returned 7.39%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for VOO. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCTD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
LCTD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.75% return.
LCTD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 7.66%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.39%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
LCTD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 7.66% | 30.42% | 3.14% | 17.10% | -16.16% | 4.48% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 18.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTD and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LCTD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCTD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCTD
VOO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
LCTD
VOO
Industrials
LCTD
VOO
Technology
LCTD
VOO
Healthcare
LCTD
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
LCTD
VOO
Basic Materials
LCTD
VOO
Consumer Defensive
LCTD
VOO
Energy
LCTD
VOO
Communication Services
LCTD
VOO
Utilities
LCTD
VOO
Real Estate
LCTD
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCTD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
LCTD
VOO
LCTD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCTD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.02 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 13.58 | -6.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCTD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.82% | -33.99% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -8.90% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.59% | -18.69% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.82% | -24.52% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -1.74% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -3.68% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.98% | +1.12% |
Volatility
LCTD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.38% and 4.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCTD | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 4.60% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 9.73% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.92% | 12.39% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 16.90% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.08% | 18.05% | -1.97% |
LCTD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LCTD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCTD and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VOO has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to LCTD (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.58% vs 7.39% for LCTD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LCTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LCTD.
LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.04% for VOO.
LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCTD and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer