PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTD vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCTD vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.72% return.


LCTD

1D
0.40%
1M
1.73%
6M
4.47%
YTD
9.67%
1Y
22.85%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
7.61%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.10%

VOO

1D
1.42%
1M
1.69%
6M
9.53%
YTD
11.72%
1Y
23.30%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.17%
ALL TIME*
14.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$320.78K$394.26K$1.78M
$3.97B$3.80B$5.49B

LCTD vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
9.67%30.42%3.14%17.10%-16.16%4.48%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.72%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021

0.77

The correlation between LCTD and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCTD vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCTD
VOO

Financial Services

27.8%
11.4%

Industrials

17.3%
8.5%

Technology

10.8%
38.6%

Healthcare

9.6%
8.9%

Basic Materials

7.2%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.5%

Energy

5.3%
3.0%

Utilities

3.6%
2.2%

Communication Services

3.1%
9.9%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Financial Services

LCTD
27.8%
VOO
11.4%

Industrials

LCTD
17.3%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

LCTD
10.8%
VOO
38.6%

Healthcare

LCTD
9.6%
VOO
8.9%

Basic Materials

LCTD
7.2%
VOO
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

LCTD
6.2%
VOO
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

LCTD
5.7%
VOO
4.5%

Energy

LCTD
5.3%
VOO
3.0%

Utilities

LCTD
3.6%
VOO
2.2%

Communication Services

LCTD
3.1%
VOO
9.9%

Real Estate

LCTD
1.5%
VOO
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCTD vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LCTD vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCTDVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.63

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

11.23

-3.91

LCTD vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTDVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-33.99%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-8.90%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.59%

-18.69%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.82%

-24.52%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

0.00%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-3.67%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

2.08%

+1.05%

Volatility

LCTD vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.81%. This indicates that LCTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCTDVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.81%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.84%

10.18%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

12.80%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

16.95%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

18.02%

-1.98%

LCTD vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LCTD vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.31%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCTD and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCTD has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to VOO (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 5-year performance, VOO leads with 13.12% vs 7.61% for LCTD. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VOO has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for LCTD.

LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCTD and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer