LCR vs. GDMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA).

LCR and GDMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCR is an actively managed fund by The Leuthold Group LLC. It was launched on Jan 6, 2020. GDMA is an actively managed fund by Gadsden. It was launched on Nov 14, 2018.

Performance

LCR vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCR vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LCR Leuthold Core ETF	-2.16%	12.43%	8.68%	12.80%	-7.58%	12.12%	13.28%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	5.56%	25.29%	7.44%	1.72%	-2.08%	3.95%	20.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCR achieves a -2.16% return, which is significantly lower than GDMA's 5.56% return.

LCR

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -4.26%
• YTD: -2.16%
• 6M: -0.55%
• 1Y: 10.25%
• 3Y*: 9.58%
• 5Y*: 6.14%
• 10Y*: —

GDMA

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -5.27%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 8.64%
• 1Y: 30.39%
• 3Y*: 14.82%
• 5Y*: 7.72%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCR vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.

LCR

Leuthold Core ETF

GDMA

Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF

Return for Risk

LCR vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCR

LCR Risk / Return Rank: 66
LCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
LCR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LCR Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GDMA

GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 96
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 96
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCR vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCR	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.52	-1.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	3.29	-1.62
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.48	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.76	4.72	-2.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.96	14.01	-7.05
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCR vs. GDMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCR Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the GDMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCR and GDMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCR	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	2.52	-1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.82	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.85	-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between LCR and GDMA is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LCR vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than GDMA's 2.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LCR Leuthold Core ETF	1.40%	1.37%	1.86%	1.60%	0.75%	0.21%	0.62%	0.00%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	2.65%	2.79%	2.32%	4.14%	1.18%	2.10%	0.62%	3.17%

Drawdowns

LCR vs. GDMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, roughly equal to the maximum GDMA drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and GDMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCR	GDMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-16.66%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.02%	-6.44%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.40%	-12.74%	-0.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.47%	-6.06%	+1.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.89%	-3.78%	+0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	2.17%	-0.65%

Volatility

LCR vs. GDMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) is 3.51%, while Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) has a volatility of 4.01%. This indicates that LCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCR	GDMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	4.01%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.07%	9.88%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.06%	12.12%	-3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.08%	9.44%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.49%	10.82%	+0.67%