LCR vs. ARKD
LCR (Leuthold Core ETF) and ARKD (ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCR is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by The Leuthold Group LLC, while ARKD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ARK. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for ARKD.
Performance
LCR vs. ARKD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCR
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 4.45%
- 6M
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- —
ARKD
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCR vs. ARKD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCR Leuthold Core ETF | 4.19% |
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | -0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCR and ARKD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCR vs. ARKD — Risk / Return Rank
LCR
ARKD
LCR vs. ARKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCR | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCR | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | -0.08 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
LCR vs. ARKD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than ARKD's maximum drawdown of -14.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and ARKD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCR | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -14.03% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.12% | +3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -6.23% | +3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | — | — |
Volatility
LCR vs. ARKD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCR | ARKD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.49% | 19.78% | -12.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 19.78% | -10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 19.78% | -8.38% |
LCR vs. ARKD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKD's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCR vs. ARKD - Dividend Comparison
LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARKD ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LCR Leuthold Core ETF | 1.31% | 1.37% | 1.86% | 1.60% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCR and ARKD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.
LCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.
LCR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ARKD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: The Leuthold Group LLC and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LCR and 0.90% for ARKD.
Find the right allocation for LCR and ARKD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer