PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCR vs. ARKD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCR vs. ARKD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LCR

1D
0.19%
1M
2.73%
YTD
4.45%
6M
5.70%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
11.43%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*

ARKD

1D
-0.98%
1M
2.07%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCR vs. ARKD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCR and ARKD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.75

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCR vs. ARKD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCR
LCR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
LCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCR vs. ARKD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) and ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF (ARKD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCRARKDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.36

LCR vs. ARKD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCRARKDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

-0.08

+0.83

Drawdowns

LCR vs. ARKD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCR drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than ARKD's maximum drawdown of -14.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCR and ARKD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCRARKDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.44%

-14.03%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.12%

+3.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-6.23%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

LCR vs. ARKD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCRARKDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.49%

19.78%

-12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.02%

19.78%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

19.78%

-8.38%

LCR vs. ARKD - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKD's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCR vs. ARKD - Dividend Comparison

LCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, while ARKD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ARKD
ARK 21Shares Digital Asset and Blockchain Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCR
Leuthold Core ETF
1.31%1.37%1.86%1.60%0.75%0.21%0.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCR and ARKD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for ARKD.

LCR has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for ARKD.

LCR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while ARKD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: The Leuthold Group LLC and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for LCR and 0.90% for ARKD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCR and ARKD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer