LCO vs. TUG
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and TUG (STF Tactical Growth ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for TUG.
Performance
LCO vs. TUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -2.51%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUG
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- 6M
- 14.28%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. TUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 2.51% |
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF | 13.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and TUG is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. TUG — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TUG
LCO vs. TUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and STF Tactical Growth ETF (TUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | TUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.99 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. TUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.40%, smaller than the maximum TUG drawdown of -22.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and TUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | TUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.40% | -22.27% | +10.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -4.45% | -6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -4.29% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.47% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. TUG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | TUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.41% | 18.31% | +7.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 18.37% | +7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.41% | 18.37% | +7.04% |
LCO vs. TUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than TUG's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. TUG - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUG STF Tactical Growth ETF | 1.46% | 1.75% | 4.97% | 1.34% | 1.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and TUG have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TUG is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TUG is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
TUG has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and STF. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.65% for TUG.
Find the right allocation for LCO and TUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer