LCO vs. INCM
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.
Performance
LCO vs. INCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INCM
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 5.84%
- 1Y
- 14.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCO vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 11.44% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and INCM is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INCM
LCO vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 18.66 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and INCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -7.84% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -1.36% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -1.08% | -3.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.77% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.73% | 5.57% | +20.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 7.28% | +18.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 7.28% | +18.45% |
LCO vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.11% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and INCM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, INCM is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INCM is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
INCM has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.38% for INCM.
Find the right allocation for LCO and INCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer