LCLG vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCLG (Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCLG charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

LCLG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCLG achieves a 19.42% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 79.03% return.

LCLG

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 11.82%
• YTD: 19.42%
• 6M: 17.86%
• 1Y: 39.05%
• 3Y*: 30.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCLG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF	19.42%	-0.32%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LCLG and MEME is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.61

LCLG vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCLG	MEME
Technology	35.1%	58.8%
Communication Services	19.4%	5.5%
Industrials	17.6%	29.9%
Consumer Cyclical	16.4%	-
Financial Services	6.6%	5.7%
Healthcare	2.8%	5.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	-
Energy	-	4.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	10.7%

Return for Risk

LCLG vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCLG

LCLG Risk / Return Rank: 61
LCLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LCLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LCLG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LCLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
LCLG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCLG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF (LCLG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCLG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCLG	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.14	0.28	+0.86

Drawdowns

LCLG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCLG drawdown since its inception was -25.79%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCLG and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCLG	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.79%	-48.78%	+22.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.93%	+5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-29.90%	+25.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCLG	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.60%	74.19%	-55.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.60%	74.19%	-52.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.60%	74.19%	-52.59%

LCLG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCLG has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCLG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCLG nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCLG Logan Capital Broad Innovative Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.97%	2.03%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCLG and MEME in my portfolio?

LCLG and MEME have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCLG or MEME?

On fees, MEME is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCLG or MEME?

MEME is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LCLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCLG or MEME?

LCLG and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between LCLG and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Logan and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for LCLG and 0.69% for MEME.