LCID vs. ZYME
LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) and ZYME (Zymeworks Inc.) are both stocks. LCID operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while ZYME operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, LCID returned -53.87%/yr vs -8.24%/yr for ZYME. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCID vs. ZYME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -50.90% return, which is significantly lower than ZYME's -9.30% return.
LCID
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -50.90%
- 6M
- -55.37%
- 1Y
- -75.97%
- 3Y*
- -54.39%
- 5Y*
- -53.87%
- 10Y*
- —
ZYME
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -10.86%
- 1Y
- 91.50%
- 3Y*
- 43.33%
- 5Y*
- -8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
LCID vs. ZYME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | -50.90% | -65.00% | -28.27% | -38.36% | -82.05% | 280.12% | -2.34% |
ZYME Zymeworks Inc. | -9.30% | 79.85% | 40.90% | 32.19% | -52.04% | -65.32% | 9.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCID and ZYME is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.21 |
Fundamentals
LCID:
$17.04B
ZYME:
$1.78B
LCID:
-$3.19
ZYME:
-$583.41
LCID:
4.89
ZYME:
22.95
LCID:
$1.12B
ZYME:
$78.86M
LCID:
-$1.62B
ZYME:
$77.16M
LCID:
-$3.03B
ZYME:
-$47.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCID vs. ZYME — Risk / Return Rank
LCID
ZYME
LCID vs. ZYME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCID | ZYME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.33 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 4.33 | -5.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 9.21 | -10.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCID vs. ZYME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than ZYME's maximum drawdown of -91.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and ZYME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCID | ZYME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.19% | -91.81% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.98% | -21.25% | -63.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.21% | -45.75% | -48.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.15% | -87.53% | -11.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.11% | -57.97% | -41.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.33% | -52.54% | -23.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.83% | 9.97% | +47.86% |
Volatility
LCID vs. ZYME - Volatility Comparison
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 22.77% compared to Zymeworks Inc. (ZYME) at 10.12%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZYME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCID | ZYME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.77% | 10.12% | +12.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.95% | 29.45% | +22.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.03% | 52.91% | +25.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.62% | 61.85% | +19.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.71% | 61.45% | +25.26% |
Dividends
LCID vs. ZYME - Dividend Comparison
Neither LCID nor ZYME has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LCID vs. ZYME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lucid Group, Inc. and Zymeworks Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LCID and ZYME have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCID has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to ZYME (10.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.19% vs ZYME's -91.81%.
ZYME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCID and ZYME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer