LCID vs. NIO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO).

Performance

LCID vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LCID vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LCID Lucid Group, Inc.	-9.84%	-65.00%	-28.27%	-38.36%	-82.05%	280.12%	1.21%
NIO NIO Inc.	18.24%	16.97%	-51.93%	-6.97%	-69.22%	-35.00%	151.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LCID : $29.87B NIO : $15.14B
EPS LCID : -$2.16 NIO : -$6.45
PS Ratio LCID : 14.34 NIO : 0.17
PB Ratio LCID : 42.60 NIO : 3.64
Total Revenue (TTM) LCID : $831.06M NIO : $87.01B
Gross Profit (TTM) LCID : -$1.32B NIO : $11.83B
EBITDA (TTM) LCID : -$2.57B NIO : -$13.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -9.84% return, which is significantly lower than NIO's 18.24% return.

LCID

• 1D: 4.15%
• 1M: -4.70%
• YTD: -9.84%
• 6M: -59.94%
• 1Y: -60.62%
• 3Y*: -50.88%
• 5Y*: -47.45%
• 10Y*: —

NIO

• 1D: 9.44%
• 1M: 23.82%
• YTD: 18.24%
• 6M: -20.87%
• 1Y: 58.27%
• 3Y*: -16.91%
• 5Y*: -31.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LCID vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCID

LCID Risk / Return Rank: 11
LCID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LCID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LCID Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LCID Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
LCID Martin Ratio Rank: 16

NIO

NIO Risk / Return Rank: 70
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCID vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCID	NIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.80	0.94	-1.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.37	1.70	-3.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.19	-0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	1.39	-2.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.31	2.62	-3.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCID vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCID Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCID and NIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCID	NIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.80	0.94	-1.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.58	-0.44	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	-0.01	-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between LCID and NIO is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LCID vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither LCID nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LCID vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -98.42%, roughly equal to the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and NIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCID	NIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.42%	-95.00%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.77%	-43.73%	-27.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-98.35%	-94.10%	-4.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.36%	-90.40%	-7.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.28%	-67.33%	-7.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.90%	23.22%	+21.68%

Volatility

LCID vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) is 18.32%, while NIO Inc. (NIO) has a volatility of 23.92%. This indicates that LCID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCID	NIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.32%	23.92%	-5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.86%	40.46%	+7.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	76.21%	62.25%	+13.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.63%	71.67%	+9.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	87.15%	87.26%	-0.11%

Financials