LCID vs. EMB
LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) is a stock, while EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index. Over the past 5 years, LCID returned -53.87%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for EMB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCID vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -50.90% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's 2.18% return.
LCID
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -50.90%
- 6M
- -55.37%
- 1Y
- -75.97%
- 3Y*
- -54.39%
- 5Y*
- -53.87%
- 10Y*
- —
EMB
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 10.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
LCID vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | -50.90% | -65.00% | -28.27% | -38.36% | -82.05% | 280.12% | -2.34% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 2.18% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCID and EMB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2020 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCID vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
LCID
EMB
LCID vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCID | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.37 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | 2.41 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 10.26 | -11.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCID vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCID | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.19% | -34.70% | -64.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.98% | -4.51% | -80.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.21% | -7.95% | -86.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.15% | -28.74% | -70.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.11% | -0.49% | -98.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.33% | -5.04% | -71.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 57.83% | 1.06% | +56.77% |
Volatility
LCID vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 22.77% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.78%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCID | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.77% | 1.78% | +20.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.95% | 4.68% | +47.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.03% | 5.68% | +72.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.62% | 9.76% | +71.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.71% | 9.96% | +76.75% |
Dividends
LCID vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
LCID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.04% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCID and EMB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCID has higher volatility (22.77%) compared to EMB (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.19% vs EMB's -34.70%.
EMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCID and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer