LCID vs. CLSE
LCID (Lucid Group, Inc.) is a stock, while CLSE (Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF) is Long-Short fund actively managed by Convergence Investment Partners. Over the past 3 years, LCID returned -54.87%/yr vs 29.19%/yr for CLSE. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LCID vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCID achieves a -38.88% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 23.64% return.
LCID
- 1D
- 8.57%
- 1M
- 28.69%
- 6M
- -35.72%
- YTD
- -38.88%
- 1Y
- -71.79%
- 3Y*
- -54.87%
- 5Y*
- -50.97%
- 10Y*
- —
CLSE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- 21.59%
- YTD
- 23.64%
- 1Y
- 45.61%
- 3Y*
- 29.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCID vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | -38.88% | -65.00% | -28.27% | -38.36% | -74.31% |
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 23.64% | 20.44% | 35.54% | 17.54% | -4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCID and CLSE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2022 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCID vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank
LCID
CLSE
LCID vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCID | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.57 | -0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 9.45 | -10.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.17 | 33.01 | -34.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCID vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCID drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCID and CLSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCID | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.20% | -16.45% | -82.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.24% | -4.85% | -80.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.93% | -16.45% | -77.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.89% | -1.92% | -96.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -76.57% | -3.54% | -73.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.34% | 1.39% | +59.95% |
Volatility
LCID vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison
Lucid Group, Inc. (LCID) has a higher volatility of 41.85% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 3.41%. This indicates that LCID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCID | CLSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.85% | 3.41% | +38.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 64.68% | 10.78% | +53.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.03% | 13.74% | +74.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.45% | 13.89% | +69.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.02% | 13.89% | +74.13% |
Dividends
LCID vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison
LCID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CLSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSE Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.77% | 0.95% | 0.93% | 1.21% | 0.85% |
LCID Lucid Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCID and CLSE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCID has higher volatility (41.85%) compared to CLSE (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCID dropped -99.20% vs CLSE's -16.45%.
CLSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCID and CLSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer