LCF vs. VTI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LCF is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCF returned 16.22%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for VTI. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.

Performance

LCF vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return.

LCF

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 2.06%
• 6M: 4.91%
• YTD: 5.83%
• 1Y: 14.96%
• 3Y*: 16.22%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTI

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.34%
• 6M: 8.99%
• YTD: 11.20%
• 1Y: 22.02%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: 14.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	5.83%	17.20%	20.71%	26.20%	-4.72%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	11.20%	17.10%	23.81%	26.05%	-5.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and VTI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2022	0.94

The correlation between LCF and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCF vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCF	VTI
Technology	37.9%	37.0%
Communication Services	18.0%	9.8%
Financial Services	12.7%	11.3%
Healthcare	9.2%	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	9.7%
Industrials	5.5%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	4.3%
Energy	2.3%	3.3%
Real Estate	1.2%	2.3%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.9%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

LCF vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF

LCF Risk / Return Rank: 38
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

VTI

VTI Risk / Return Rank: 66
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 64
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCF	VTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	1.72	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.38	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.31	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.48	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.00	10.85	-5.85

LCF vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCF vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and VTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCF	VTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-55.45%	+37.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-8.92%	-2.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.28%	-19.30%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.36%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.00%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.73%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-8.00%	+5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.00%	2.03%	+0.97%

Volatility

LCF vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) has a higher volatility of 3.80% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 3.38%. This indicates that LCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCF	VTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	3.38%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.07%	10.13%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	12.82%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.44%	17.51%	-2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.44%	18.28%	-2.84%

LCF vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCF vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VTI's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.52%	0.55%	0.63%	0.71%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	1.05%	1.12%	1.27%	1.44%	1.66%	1.21%	1.42%	1.78%	2.04%	1.71%	1.92%	1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCF and VTI in my portfolio?

LCF and VTI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCF or VTI?

LCF has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to VTI (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs VTI's -55.45%.

Which ETF is better, LCF or VTI?

On 3-year performance, VTI leads with 19.69% vs 16.22% for LCF. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCF or VTI?

Over the 3-year period, VTI has performed better with a 19.69% return vs 16.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCF or VTI?

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCF or VTI?

VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.

What is the main difference between LCF and VTI?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.03% for VTI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.