LCF vs. TLCI
LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and TLCI (Touchstone International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Touchstone, while TLCI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Touchstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LCF returned 16.00% vs 2.23% for TLCI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for TLCI.
Performance
LCF vs. TLCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than TLCI's 0.28% return.
LCF
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 16.00%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLCI
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCF vs. TLCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 1.47% | 17.90% |
TLCI Touchstone International Equity ETF | 0.28% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCF and TLCI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between LCF and TLCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCF vs. TLCI — Risk / Return Rank
LCF
TLCI
LCF vs. TLCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCF | TLCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.04 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 0.19 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 0.58 | +4.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCF vs. TLCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, which is greater than TLCI's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and TLCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCF | TLCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -12.15% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -11.83% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.98% | -3.69% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -2.84% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.87% | -0.98% |
Volatility
LCF vs. TLCI - Volatility Comparison
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) at 3.41%. This indicates that LCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCF | TLCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 3.41% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 11.26% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.43% | 13.43% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 15.68% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.51% | 15.68% | -0.17% |
LCF vs. TLCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TLCI's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCF vs. TLCI - Dividend Comparison
LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than TLCI's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 0.54% | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.24% |
TLCI Touchstone International Equity ETF | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCF and TLCI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LCF has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to TLCI (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs TLCI's -12.15%.
On 1-year performance, LCF leads with 16.00% vs 2.23% for TLCI. On fees, TLCI is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, TLCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LCF has performed better with a 16.00% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLCI is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.
TLCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.54% for LCF.
LCF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TLCI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.37% for TLCI.
LCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCF and TLCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer