PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCF vs. TLCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCF vs. TLCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than TLCI's 0.28% return.


LCF

1D
-1.41%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.35%
1Y
16.00%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TLCI

1D
-1.03%
1M
1.32%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.45%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. TLCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCF and TLCI is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

0.64

The correlation between LCF and TLCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCF vs. TLCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TLCI
TLCI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TLCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLCI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TLCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLCI Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. TLCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCFTLCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

0.19

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

0.58

+4.97

LCF vs. TLCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the TLCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and TLCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCF vs. TLCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, which is greater than TLCI's maximum drawdown of -12.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and TLCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFTLCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-12.15%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-11.83%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.98%

-3.69%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-2.84%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

3.87%

-0.98%

Volatility

LCF vs. TLCI - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Touchstone International Equity ETF (TLCI) at 3.41%. This indicates that LCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCFTLCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.44%

3.41%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

11.26%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.43%

13.43%

-1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.68%

-0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.51%

15.68%

-0.17%

LCF vs. TLCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TLCI's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCF vs. TLCI - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than TLCI's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.54%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%
TLCI
Touchstone International Equity ETF
0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCF and TLCI have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCF has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to TLCI (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs TLCI's -12.15%.

On 1-year performance, LCF leads with 16.00% vs 2.23% for TLCI. On fees, TLCI is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, TLCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCF has performed better with a 16.00% return vs 2.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLCI is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

TLCI has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.54% for LCF.

LCF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TLCI is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.37% for TLCI.

LCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCF and TLCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer