LCF vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LCF returned 20.57% vs 72.64% for CNAV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

LCF vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 4.06% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 47.26% return.

LCF

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 5.01%
• 1Y: 20.57%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 21.60%
• YTD: 47.26%
• 6M: 48.02%
• 1Y: 72.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	4.06%	17.20%	2.81%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	47.26%	16.80%	6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and CNAV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.71

The correlation between LCF and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCF vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF

LCF Risk / Return Rank: 46
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 87
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCF	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	2.91	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	3.62	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.48	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	5.63	-3.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.32	24.09	-16.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCF vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCF	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.73	2.91	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	1.62	-0.59

Drawdowns

LCF vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCF	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-30.06%	+11.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.67%	-12.97%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.53%	0.00%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-5.42%	+2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	3.02%	-0.20%

Volatility

LCF vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 2.69%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCF	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.69%	12.28%	-9.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.08%	21.02%	-11.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.92%	25.08%	-13.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.47%	27.16%	-11.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	27.16%	-11.69%

LCF vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCF vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, while CNAV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF	0.52%	0.55%	0.63%	0.71%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCF and CNAV in my portfolio?

LCF and CNAV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCF or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to LCF (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, LCF or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 72.64% vs 20.57% for LCF. On fees, LCF is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCF or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 72.64% return vs 20.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCF or CNAV?

LCF is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCF or CNAV?

LCF has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for CNAV.

What is the main difference between LCF and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.