LCDS vs. FNDB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCDS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. LCDS is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. Over the past year, LCDS returned 27.70% vs 32.19% for FNDB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LCDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.

Performance

LCDS vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCDS achieves a 10.32% return, which is significantly lower than FNDB's 14.46% return.

LCDS

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 10.32%
• 6M: 10.99%
• 1Y: 27.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 14.46%
• 6M: 14.53%
• 1Y: 32.19%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCDS vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF	10.32%	17.66%	10.32%
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.46%	16.23%	7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between LCDS and FNDB is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2024	0.81

The correlation between LCDS and FNDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LCDS vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCDS

LCDS Risk / Return Rank: 71
LCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
LCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
LCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
LCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
LCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 88
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCDS vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCDS	FNDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	3.02	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	4.23	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.55	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	5.14	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.89	19.75	-5.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCDS vs. FNDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the FNDB Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCDS and FNDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCDS	FNDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	3.02	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.79	+0.57

Drawdowns

LCDS vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCDS drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCDS and FNDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCDS	FNDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.39%	-38.17%	+19.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-6.29%	-2.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.15%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-3.66%	+1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.63%	+0.37%

Volatility

LCDS vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF (LCDS) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) at 2.40%. This indicates that LCDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCDS	FNDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.75%	2.40%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.88%	7.60%	+1.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.68%	10.72%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	15.36%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	17.48%	-1.24%

LCDS vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCDS vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison

LCDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than FNDB's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%
LCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Core ETF	0.88%	0.92%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCDS and FNDB in my portfolio?

LCDS and FNDB have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCDS or FNDB?

LCDS has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to FNDB (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCDS dropped -18.39% vs FNDB's -38.17%.

Which ETF is better, LCDS or FNDB?

On 1-year performance, FNDB leads with 32.19% vs 27.70% for LCDS. On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCDS or FNDB?

Over the 1-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 32.19% return vs 27.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCDS or FNDB?

FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LCDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCDS or FNDB?

FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.88% for LCDS.

What is the main difference between LCDS and FNDB?

LCDS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LCDS and 0.25% for FNDB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.