LCAP vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCAP (Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LCAP is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Over the past year, LCAP returned 27.27% vs 0.20% for DFND. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCAP charges 0.29%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

LCAP vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LCAP

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 3.30%
• YTD: 12.02%
• 6M: 11.68%
• 1Y: 27.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAP vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF	12.02%	18.16%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	6.16%

Correlation

The correlation between LCAP and DFND is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	0.21

LCAP vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCAP	DFND
Technology	36.0%	24.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	3.5%
Financial Services	12.5%	18.2%
Communication Services	11.0%	0.8%
Healthcare	9.3%	10.7%
Industrials	6.1%	17.1%
Energy	3.8%	1.7%
Utilities	3.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	4.3%
Real Estate	1.6%	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	4.2%

Return for Risk

LCAP vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAP

LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 65
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 63
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 67

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAP vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LCAP	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	0.02	+2.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	0.11	+2.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.02	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	0.07	+2.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	0.13	+11.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LCAP vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAP and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCAP	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.14	0.02	+2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.59	0.36	+1.23

Drawdowns

LCAP vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCAP	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-22.65%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.32%	-3.44%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-3.69%	+2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.61%	-5.70%	+4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	3.70%	-1.43%

Volatility

LCAP vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that LCAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCAP	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.98%	0.00%	+2.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.16%	6.16%	+4.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	10.92%	+1.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.88%	22.46%	-5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.88%	19.09%	-2.21%

LCAP vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCAP vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF	0.10%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCAP and DFND in my portfolio?

LCAP and DFND have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCAP or DFND?

LCAP has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAP dropped -11.31% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, LCAP or DFND?

On 1-year performance, LCAP leads with 27.27% vs 0.20% for DFND. On fees, LCAP is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCAP or DFND?

Over the 1-year period, LCAP has performed better with a 27.27% return vs 0.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCAP or DFND?

LCAP is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCAP or DFND?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.10% for LCAP.

What is the main difference between LCAP and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.