PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAP vs. IG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAP vs. IG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LCAP

1D
0.45%
1M
3.92%
YTD
13.00%
6M
12.58%
1Y
28.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IG

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.55%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAP vs. IG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LCAP and IG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026

0.76

LCAP vs. IG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LCAP
IG

Technology

36.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

13.3%

-

Financial Services

12.5%
2.9%

Communication Services

11.0%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Industrials

6.1%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.4%

-

Technology

LCAP
36.0%
IG

-

Consumer Cyclical

LCAP
13.3%
IG

-

Financial Services

LCAP
12.5%
IG
2.9%

Communication Services

LCAP
11.0%
IG

-

Healthcare

LCAP
9.3%
IG

-

Industrials

LCAP
6.1%
IG

-

Energy

LCAP
3.8%
IG

-

Utilities

LCAP
3.2%
IG

-

Basic Materials

LCAP
1.6%
IG

-

Real Estate

LCAP
1.6%
IG

-

Consumer Defensive

LCAP
1.4%
IG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAP vs. IG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAP
LCAP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
LCAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IG
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAP vs. IG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCAPIGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.97

LCAP vs. IG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCAPIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.02

+1.63

Drawdowns

LCAP vs. IG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, which is greater than IG's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and IG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAPIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-1.75%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.61%

-0.54%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.27%

Volatility

LCAP vs. IG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAPIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.79%

4.94%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.89%

4.94%

+11.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.89%

4.94%

+11.95%

LCAP vs. IG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IG's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCAP vs. IG - Dividend Comparison

LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than IG's 0.84% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


LCAP and IG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCAP.

IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.09% for LCAP.

LCAP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.26% for IG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAP and IG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer