LCAP vs. IG
LCAP (Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF) and IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCAP is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while IG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Principal. Both are actively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCAP charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for IG.
Performance
LCAP vs. IG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCAP
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- YTD
- 13.00%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 28.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IG
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCAP vs. IG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 5.10% |
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAP and IG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.76 |
LCAP vs. IG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCAP
IG
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
LCAP
IG
-
Consumer Cyclical
LCAP
IG
-
Financial Services
LCAP
IG
Communication Services
LCAP
IG
-
Healthcare
LCAP
IG
-
Industrials
LCAP
IG
-
Energy
LCAP
IG
-
Utilities
LCAP
IG
-
Basic Materials
LCAP
IG
-
Real Estate
LCAP
IG
-
Consumer Defensive
LCAP
IG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCAP vs. IG — Risk / Return Rank
LCAP
IG
LCAP vs. IG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF (LCAP) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCAP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.20 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.97 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCAP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.65 | 0.02 | +1.63 |
Drawdowns
LCAP vs. IG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAP drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, which is greater than IG's maximum drawdown of -1.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAP and IG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -1.75% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.09% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -0.54% | -1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | — | — |
Volatility
LCAP vs. IG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCAP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.79% | 4.94% | +7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 4.94% | +11.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.89% | 4.94% | +11.95% |
LCAP vs. IG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAP has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than IG's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCAP vs. IG - Dividend Comparison
LCAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than IG's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 0.84% | 0.00% |
LCAP Principal Capital Appreciation Select ETF | 0.09% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCAP and IG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for LCAP.
IG has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.09% for LCAP.
LCAP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for LCAP and 0.26% for IG.
Find the right allocation for LCAP and IG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer