PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAIX vs. GLFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCAIX achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than GLFOX's 8.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LCAIX has underperformed GLFOX with an annualized return of 7.02%, while GLFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


LCAIX

1D
-1.65%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
5.62%
6M
4.69%
1Y
15.21%
3Y*
12.99%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.02%

GLFOX

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
8.78%
6M
9.02%
1Y
16.48%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
11.19%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCAIX
Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio
5.62%14.10%11.73%10.32%-14.93%12.99%9.47%15.16%-12.77%17.76%
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
8.78%23.53%6.43%10.59%-1.59%19.67%-4.71%21.95%-4.06%20.44%

Correlation

The correlation between LCAIX and GLFOX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between LCAIX and GLFOX has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAIX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAIX
LCAIX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LCAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

GLFOX
GLFOX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GLFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LCAIXGLFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.28

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.84

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

5.72

+3.30

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the GLFOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAIX and GLFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAIX drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than GLFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAIX and GLFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAIXGLFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-29.65%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-9.01%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-10.07%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-17.14%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

-29.65%

+6.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-4.52%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.87%

-3.42%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.89%

-1.09%

Volatility

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) at 2.61%. This indicates that LCAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAIXGLFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

2.61%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

9.39%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.39%

10.84%

-0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

11.01%

+1.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.92%

13.24%

-1.32%

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison

LCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.80%, more than GLFOX's 7.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLFOX
Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares
7.01%6.03%4.00%2.69%14.50%6.02%2.39%4.20%13.99%6.82%2.07%11.01%
LCAIX
Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio
13.80%14.58%10.24%3.04%3.64%4.32%2.11%1.97%6.02%7.72%1.67%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCAIX and GLFOX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCAIX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to GLFOX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAIX dropped -40.62% vs GLFOX's -29.65%.

LCAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAIX and GLFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer