LCAIX vs. GLFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX).
LCAIX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Mar 25, 2008. GLFOX is managed by Lazard. It was launched on Dec 31, 2009.
Performance
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAIX Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio | -3.45% | 14.10% | 11.73% | 10.32% | -14.93% | 12.99% | 9.47% | 15.16% | -12.77% | 17.76% |
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 5.88% | 23.53% | 6.43% | 10.59% | -1.59% | 19.67% | -4.71% | 21.95% | -4.06% | 20.44% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCAIX achieves a -3.45% return, which is significantly lower than GLFOX's 5.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LCAIX has underperformed GLFOX with an annualized return of 6.09%, while GLFOX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.
LCAIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -3.45%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
GLFOX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 22.84%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCAIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than GLFOX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCAIX vs. GLFOX — Risk / Return Rank
LCAIX
GLFOX
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCAIX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 2.20 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 2.79 | -1.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.42 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 2.71 | -1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.28 | 11.32 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCAIX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.20 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 1.11 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.73 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.83 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCAIX and GLFOX is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Dividend Comparison
LCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.10%, more than GLFOX's 6.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCAIX Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio | 15.10% | 14.58% | 10.24% | 3.04% | 3.64% | 4.32% | 2.11% | 1.97% | 6.02% | 7.72% | 1.67% | 2.94% |
GLFOX Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares | 6.18% | 6.03% | 4.00% | 2.69% | 14.50% | 6.02% | 2.39% | 4.20% | 13.99% | 6.82% | 2.07% | 11.01% |
Drawdowns
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCAIX drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than GLFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAIX and GLFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCAIX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.62% | -29.65% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -9.01% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | -17.14% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.99% | -29.65% | +6.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.03% | -7.06% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -3.41% | -3.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 2.16% | -0.03% |
Volatility
LCAIX vs. GLFOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) is 3.95%, while Lazard Global Listed Infrastructure Portfolio Open Shares (GLFOX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that LCAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCAIX | GLFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 4.59% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.52% | 7.39% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.07% | 10.76% | +2.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.34% | 10.71% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.84% | 13.27% | -1.43% |