PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCAIX vs. ABRZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCAIX achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than ABRZX's 20.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LCAIX has outperformed ABRZX with an annualized return of 7.06%, while ABRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.83% annualized return.


LCAIX

1D
0.18%
1M
3.69%
YTD
8.19%
6M
9.01%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
14.02%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
7.06%

ABRZX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.34%
YTD
20.22%
6M
20.35%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
4.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LCAIX
Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio
8.19%14.10%11.73%10.32%-14.93%12.99%9.47%15.16%-12.77%17.76%
ABRZX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A
20.22%8.20%3.14%5.97%-14.96%9.36%9.20%9.43%-7.01%9.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LCAIX and ABRZX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009

0.58

The correlation between LCAIX and ABRZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCAIX vs. ABRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCAIX
LCAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LCAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LCAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ABRZX
ABRZX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ABRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCAIXABRZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

3.41

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.91

4.49

-1.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.69

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

7.42

-4.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.59

26.97

-15.38

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the ABRZX Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCAIX and ABRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCAIXABRZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

3.41

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.36

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.62

-0.25

Drawdowns

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCAIX drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, which is greater than ABRZX's maximum drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCAIX and ABRZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCAIXABRZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.62%

-26.62%

-14.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

-4.07%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.48%

-18.28%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.17%

-19.33%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

-26.62%

+3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.89%

-4.75%

-2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.12%

+0.63%

Volatility

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Volatility Comparison

Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio (LCAIX) and Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCAIXABRZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

2.90%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

7.89%

-0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.68%

8.86%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

12.21%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.89%

10.90%

+0.99%

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCAIX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than ABRZX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCAIX vs. ABRZX - Dividend Comparison

LCAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.47%, more than ABRZX's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRZX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A
2.81%3.38%13.28%2.21%0.00%26.02%1.18%6.49%0.00%6.43%4.41%6.91%
LCAIX
Lazard Opportunistic Strategies Portfolio
13.47%14.58%10.24%3.04%3.64%4.32%2.11%1.97%6.02%7.72%1.67%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCAIX and ABRZX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCAIX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to ABRZX (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCAIX dropped -40.62% vs ABRZX's -26.62%.

ABRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCAIX and ABRZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer