LBWIX vs. FKDNX
Compare and contrast key facts about BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX).
LBWIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. FKDNX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jan 2, 1968.
Performance
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBWIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund | 1.48% | 17.38% | 18.59% | 7.42% | -1.56% | 29.74% | -1.41% | 25.66% | -9.05% | 17.79% |
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | -15.24% | 18.59% | 30.57% | 44.42% | -40.30% | 12.53% | 57.68% | 36.36% | 2.85% | 39.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBWIX achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly higher than FKDNX's -15.24% return. Over the past 10 years, LBWIX has underperformed FKDNX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while FKDNX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
LBWIX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -5.06%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
FKDNX
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -9.29%
- YTD
- -15.24%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBWIX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBWIX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank
LBWIX
FKDNX
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBWIX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.09 | 0.55 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.57 | 0.96 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.47 | +0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.57 | 1.54 | +4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBWIX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 0.55 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.21 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.63 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.64 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBWIX and FKDNX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison
LBWIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%, less than FKDNX's 13.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBWIX BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund | 12.27% | 12.45% | 11.18% | 1.90% | 13.87% | 16.48% | 2.89% | 11.13% | 11.30% | 6.47% | 6.95% | 6.82% |
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 13.17% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBWIX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBWIX and FKDNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBWIX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -51.63% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -20.49% | +9.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -48.28% | +30.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.22% | -48.28% | +10.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.32% | -20.49% | +14.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -11.28% | +7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 6.28% | -3.60% |
Volatility
LBWIX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - Diversified US Large Cap Value Fund (LBWIX) is 3.11%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that LBWIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBWIX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.11% | 7.59% | -4.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.93% | 16.06% | -8.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.14% | 26.04% | -10.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 26.20% | -11.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 24.48% | -6.63% |