LBSAX vs. CTCAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX).
LBSAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 25, 2002. CTCAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 9, 2000.
Performance
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A | 1.55% | 15.58% | 14.73% | 10.26% | -5.19% | 25.97% | 7.48% | 27.84% | -4.62% | 19.96% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | -10.22% | 24.78% | 31.39% | 56.46% | -34.81% | 22.73% | 49.46% | 43.91% | -1.48% | 42.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LBSAX achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly higher than CTCAX's -10.22% return. Over the past 10 years, LBSAX has underperformed CTCAX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while CTCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.26% annualized return.
LBSAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 14.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
CTCAX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.75%
- YTD
- -10.22%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- 20.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LBSAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CTCAX's 1.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LBSAX vs. CTCAX — Risk / Return Rank
LBSAX
CTCAX
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) and Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LBSAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.66 | 1.57 | +0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.22 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 1.67 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.65 | 5.92 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LBSAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 1.02 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.49 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.82 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between LBSAX and CTCAX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Dividend Comparison
LBSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, more than CTCAX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LBSAX Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A | 5.07% | 5.11% | 5.78% | 4.72% | 3.62% | 2.65% | 1.52% | 2.68% | 7.36% | 3.83% | 3.60% | 8.01% |
CTCAX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A | 3.66% | 3.29% | 1.08% | 2.36% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 0.91% | 2.55% | 5.82% | 3.52% | 0.36% | 1.80% |
Drawdowns
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LBSAX drawdown since its inception was -47.89%, smaller than the maximum CTCAX drawdown of -61.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBSAX and CTCAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LBSAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.89% | -61.04% | +13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.19% | -14.43% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.16% | -39.55% | +22.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.82% | -39.55% | +6.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.50% | -14.43% | +8.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.29% | -10.75% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 4.07% | -1.88% |
Volatility
LBSAX vs. CTCAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Dividend Income Fund Class A (LBSAX) is 2.92%, while Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund Class A (CTCAX) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that LBSAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LBSAX | CTCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 7.45% | -4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.83% | 16.24% | -9.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 27.00% | -13.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 25.81% | -12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 24.66% | -8.98% |